This is mnoGoSearch's cache of http://files.usgwarchives.net/pa/clearfield/history/aldrich/chapter-09.txt. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared during last crawling. The current page could have changed in the meantime.

Last modified: Wed, 27 Apr 2011, 10:34:32 EDT    Size: 28062
Clearfield County PA Archives History.....Aldrich History of Clearfield
County - Chapter 9

Copyright 2008.  All rights reserved.
http://www.usgwarchives.net/copyright.htm
http://www.usgwarchives.net/pa/pafiles.htm
************************************************

File contributed for use in USGenWeb Archives by:
Ellis Michaels, <ellisrn@gmail.com>, Aug 2008

This page was last updated:
20 Aug 2008

http://files.usgwarchives.net/pa/clearfield/history/aldrich/chapter-09.txt

**********************************************************

HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY

EDITED BY 
LEWIS CASS ALDRICH 

SYRACUSE, N. Y. 
D. MASON & CO., PUBLISHERS 
1887 

***********************************************************

Page 73
CHAPTER IX. 
PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND COURTS. 

Plan of the County Seat-Lots Donated for Public Buildings-The Old Log Jail-
The Jail Built in 1841-2 -The Present Jail --Its Cost--The First Court-House -
Description -Important Cases Tried Therein-The New Court-House Built -Courts
in the Old Church --Court-House Remodeled and Additions Built -Some Leading Causes
Recalled. 


     WHEN the commissioners appointed by the governor determined to fix the
seat of justice of the newly created county upon lands of Abraham Witmer, the
latter at once caused a plot of the whole locality to be made, and laid out
intersecting streets and alleys and intermediate squares of building lots.
Market street, the main east and west thoroughfare was laid upon the old 
“ Milesburg road,” and the town extended two squares north and south from
that road. Walnut street formed the south, and Pine street the north boundary
of the town, the intervening streets being Locust, Market, and Cherry, and
alleys having no name. The streets running north and south were named, 

***********************************************************

Page 74
HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY. 

commencing at the river, Water street, near the river bank; Front street,
afterward called First street; Second street, Third street, and Fourth
street.  The river formed the west, and Fourth street the east boundary.

     The lot donated for the erection of county buildings was located on the
northeast corner of Market and Second streets, and was known on the map as
number seventy-five ; the market-house lot fronts on Market street and is
known as number eighty; the jail lot was located on Locust street, and
cornered on an alley, and is number ninety-one. On this lot now stands the
dwelling house of Mrs. David Sackett. The three lots donated for the erection
of an academy lay in the extreme southeast corner of the town, on the corner
of Walnut and Fourth streets, and are numbered one hundred and sixty-two, one
hundred and seventy-seven, and one hundred and seventy-eight, respectively.
These were found to be impracticable for the intended purpose and were
exchanged for lots on Front, or First street, between Market and Cherry
streets, a much more desirable location. 

     Although the dedication of the several lots above mentioned was made by
Mr. Witmer in the year 1804, the deed for them was not executed until March
8, 1813. The conveyance was made by Abraham Witmer, and Mary, his wife, of
the township and county of Lancaster, Pa., to Robert Maxwell, Hugh Jordon,
and Samuel Fulton, commissioners of the county of Clearfield, or to
their successors in office, in trust for the said county of Clearfield, for
the purpose of erecting public buildings thereon. 

     The lot donated for the erection of the jail on Locust street was never
used for that purpose. The old jail was built on the site now occupied by the
residence of Dr. J. P. Burchfield, on Second street, and was torn down at the
time the residence was built. Some of the old timbers were used in the
construction of the house. The jail was built of hewed logs, with a shingle
roof 
and heavy wooden door. The windows had iron bars across to prevent escape.
Although primitive in design and construction, this prison served the
purposes of the county until the erection of the more substantial county jail
on the site now occupied by the opera house block. For this structure land
was purchased of Martin Nichols, sr., at the price of three hundred dollars.
The building was of stone, two stories in height. 

     The front part was tastefully fitted up for the sheriff’s apartments,
and the rear arranged for jail purposes. It was built by Martin Nichols, sr.,
and Jonathan M. Nichols, of Clearfield, at a cost of about thirty-five
hundred dollars. 

     The present county jail was built by George Thorn, of Clearfield, in
the years 1870-1-2, on lands purchased from Hon. William Bigler, at the lower
end of Second street. The material used in construction of the walls, both
for the building and yard enclosure, was white and yellow sandstone. The
front, on Second street, is occupied by the sheriff as a residence, the place
for confinement of prisoners being further back. The main hall is fourteen
feet in 

***********************************************************

Page 75 
PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND COURTS.

width and about seventy feet long.  The cells are constructed on both sides
of this hall, twelve on each side, six below and six above.  The cost of this
structure, as per contract, exclusive of the price paid for the land, was
sixty-eight thousand dollars.  Other work, coming under the head of "extras,"
brought the entire expense of the structure to a much greater figure.  The
land cost seven thousand dollars.

     The first court-house of the county was built by Robert Collins. It was
modeled after the Lycoming county court-house, which was built by Mr. Collins
early in the present century. Soon after the organization of this county he
was induced to come to Clearfield, and the fact that a court-house would soon
be erected here, hastened his determination, although the building was 
not commenced until some years later. In the year 1814 the work was
commenced, and completed in the following year. No data is obtainable showing
the precise time of commencement, or completion of this court-house, but the
dates given may be considered reasonably correct. Collins was awarded the
contract at the agreed price of three thousand dollars. The building was two
stories high, built of brick, with rooms for county officers above, and the
courtroom below. The roof was made of shingles, and a small cupola rose above
the building proper. There was no attempt at ornament in its construction, as
the scarcity of money at that time would admit of no unnecessary expenditure. 

     The first court was held at a term commencing October 21, 1822. From
the Quarter Sessions docket some extracts are made. At a Court of Quarter
Sessions of the Peace, a court of Common Pleas and Orphans Court, began and
holden at the town of Clearfield, in and for the county of Clearfield, before
Hon. Francis W. Rawle and Moses Boggs, esqs., justices and judges of the said
courts. 

     The acts of Assembly organizing Clearfield county for judicial
purposes, being read, and the courts being! duly opened, the commissions of
the said judges, F. W. Rawle and M. Boggs were presented and read. The
commission of Samuel Fulton, prothonotary, of the said Court of Common Pleas,
and clerk of the said Court of Quarter Sessions and Orphans Court, were also
presented and read, and also the commission of Greenwood Bell, sheriff of the
said county of Clearfield, and writ of assistance, were presented and read. 

     On motion of W. R. Smith, esq., Moses Canan was admitted and sworn as
an attorney of the courts, and on the motion of Moses Canan, esq., the
following named gentlemen were admitted and sworn or affirmed as attorneys of
the same courts, namely, William R. Smith, Daniel Stanard, Joseph M. Fox,
John Blanchard, James Hepberton, John Williamson, Hugh H. Brady, Thomas
White, William J. Christie, John G. Miles, and Samuel M. Green. 

     Samuel M. Green was appointed by the attorney-general of the State as
deputy attorney-general of this county, and he was now sworn into office. The
returns of the constables were then made; Valentine Flegal repre-

***********************************************************

Page 76
HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY. 

senting Bradford, Hugh Caldwell, for Lawrence, and William Hepburn, for Pike
township. William Shepherd also appeared for Gibson township, but made no
return. 

     The first petition presented by sundry inhabitants of the county,
praying that a road be laid out from the Cambria county line to intersect,
near the house of John H. Turner, in Beccaria township, the road leading from
Gallager’s mill to Turner’s mill. The court appointed Adam L. Keagy, William
Wright, Amasa Smith, James Rea, Thomas Jordon. and Robert Patterson,
commissioners to view and report to the court upon the necessity of this
road. The road was laid out and report confirmed at the March Sessions in
1883. 

      Upon the presentation of petitions, licenses to keep tavern were
granted to Thomas Hemphill, Robert Collins, and William Philips, all of
Clearfield town. This concluded the first day’s business, whereupon court
adjourned until the following day. 

     After the adjournment, as the story goes, the newly-made lawyers, with
the judges and a party of friends, repaired to a convenient hotel, where they
celebrated, in truly royal fashion, this great event. Their great joy led
them so far that, with a single exception, every soul of them became overcome
by - circumstances - and water from the Susquehanna River. The narrator of
this event said there was one person who did not partake of the festivities
of the occasion, but was perfectly clear in the statement that he was not
that one. 

     On the morning of the 22d, at the opening of court, Hon. Charles
Huston, president judge ‘of the Fourth Judicial District, appeared and took
his seat as president judge of the court. 

     On motion, William Potter was admitted and sworn as an attorney of the
courts. William Wilson received the appointment of county auditor in place of
Martin Hoover, resigned. 

     Alexander Caldwell was made deputy-constable of Lawrence, and Isaac
Ricketts constable of Beccaria township. 

     Petitions were received and filed, praying for the laying out of roads,
one from Clearfield bridge to Widow Ardery’s; one from James Green’s to the
county line, in Fox township ; one from Turner’s mill to Karthaus bridge ;
one from Elijah Meredith’s to the Fox Company’s mill, in Fox township ; and
one from the inhabitants of Pike and Beccaria townships, to be laid therein.
All, except the last, were subsequently confirmed. 

    The first term of court at which a grand and traverse juries were called
was held in December, 1822, with Hon. Charles Huston, presiding. The grand
jurors summoned on that occasion were Thomas Reed, foreman ; Alexander
Dunlap, Caleb Davis (absent), John McCracken, John Henry, A. B. Reed, esq.,
Joseph Irvin, John Stugart, Jacob Hoover, Hugh Hall, esq., Hugh McMullen,
Henry Mead, Consider Brockway, Robert Beers, James Iddings, Joseph Mason
(absent), John H. Turner, John Bloom, Thomas Lewis, Benjamin Smeal, Joseph
Davis, Thomas Haney, Samuel Turner, James McNeil. 

***********************************************************
Page 77
ORGANIZATION OF THE COUNTY. 

     After having been in session about three days, they presented "true
bills" as follows:  The Commonwealth against Alexander Osborne, indicted for
keeping a "tippling-house."  On payment of costs a nolle prosequi was
entered.  Commonwealth versus Hugh Coleman and Thomas Lewis, supervisors of
Gibson township, for nuisance in highway.  On motion of Thomas Burnside the
indictment was quashed.  Commonwealth versus James I. Thorne, blasphemy;
bailed for future appearance.  Commonwealth versus Isaac Rodden, keeping a
tippling-house; nolle prosequi ordered.  Commonwealth versus Absalom Timms,
tippling-house; nolle prosequi ordered.  Commonwealth versus Jonathan R.
Ames, passing counterfeit money; bailed to the United States Circuit Court.

     Alexander B. Reed was appointed county treasurer December 19, 1822. The
first traverse jurors summoned in the county were for attendance at this
court. They were : William Wright, Richard Shaw, John Irvin, Samuel Tate,
George Brown, John Fullerton, Thomas Dent, James McKee, Alexander Read, James
Rea, James Wright; Matthew Gile, Abraham Ross, William Ross, Anthony Wright,
Joseph Turner, Robert Ross, jr., James A. Read, jr.,, James Wilson, Samuel
Ardery, Christian Straw, George B. Dale (absent), Jacob Flegal, Hugh Frazier,
Crawford Gallager, George Ross, Jacob Hoover, John Swan, Lawrence Monahan,
Orris Hoyt, James Young, Jonathan Hartshorn, Moses Norris, Jason Kirk, John
Moore, Robert Wilson. 

     It will be unnecessary in this chapter to go further into detail
regarding the first court, or the proceedings thereof. The jury lists will
serve in a manner to show who were some of the old residents of the county,
and the records will suffice for a description of the first judicial
proceedings had in the county. The old court-house building, which, in its
day, was as pretentious, and perhaps more substantial, than any surrounding
buildings of the town, is now a thing of the past; yet, it has left its
history in the many memorable cases, civil and criminal, that have been tried
within its walls. Among the hundreds and thousands of cases in litigation,
tried during the sixty years of time in which the court-house was in use, a
few may be recalled as specially momentous. The case of the Commonwealth
against Lawrence Allman, indicted for the murder of his brother Godfrey, in a
fit of jealous passion. Judge Woodward was then on the bench, and the trial
created the most intense excitement throughout the entire county. Allman was
convicted of murder in the first degree, but a new trial was granted, which
resulted in a verdict of “guilty of murder in the second degree.” The
prisoner was sentenced to twelve years imprisonment. 

     The peculiar Plunkett case was another that caused much excitement and
still more comment, on account of the impossibilities regarding it. 

     One Campbell was perhaps as conspicuous an offender as ever was
arraigned for trial in any court. The whole catalogue of offenses and
misdemeanors, less 

(11)

***********************************************************

Page 78
HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY. 

than capital crimes, were chargeable to this person, and it is estimated
that he was arraigned at least twenty different times.  He certainly enjoyed
the notoriety of being called an habitual criminal.

     The famous libel suit of Dr. W. P. Hill versus Dr. Loraine, was another
of the celebrated causes tried in the old court-house. 

     Karthaus versus Wiggins, an action for trespass, was the longest trial
on record in the county. 

     These are but a few of the many cases that were tried in the courts of
this county prior to the year 1860. But, as years passed and the population
of the county increased, a new and larger building became a necessity. The
subject was agitated and discussed by the officials and people as early as
1845, and when the project was sufficiently advanced to take some definite
shape, a new feature was introduced. The citizens of Curwensville, and
residents in the south part of the county, were anxious that the county seat
should be removed to Curwensville. Naturally and vigorously was this opposed
by the Clearfielders and residents of the lower part of the county. The
champions of the project of Curwensville offered to donate the lands and
erect the necessary buildings free of any expense to the county, and even
went so far as to ask for legislative action in interest of the change. Here
the Clearfield residents had the advantage. The most influential political
workers were in favor of retaining the buildings, as in former years, and
they were successful. The commissioners entered into a contract for the
erection of a substantial brick building upon plans submitted by Cleaveland &
Bachus. The contract was awarded to George Thorn, of Clearfield, at the
agreed price of $16,500, and to use the material of the old building in the
erection of the new so far as could be utilized. The work of tearing down the
old court-house was begun in March, 1860, and in a few days’ time no trace of
it remained. In its stead, however, there gradually arose a structure more
complete, more imposing in appearance, and better 
calculated to meet the growing necessities of the people of the county. 

     During the interval between the demolition of the old, and the
completion of the new building, courts were held in the old Methodist Church
edifice, on Cherry street, between Second and Third streets; but this, too,
is now gone, and in its place stands a substantial double frame dwelling,
constructed in part from the material of the church building. 

     Among the causes tried in the Cherry street building, that attracted
some considerable attention, was the indictment of Sarah Brenniman, for
infanticide. Although the prisoner had confessed the crime, she was
acquitted. 

     James Hauckenbery was tried for the murder of John Thompson, better
known as “ Devil ” Thompson, a dangerous character. Hauckenbery pleaded self-
defense; that at the time he was in fear of his life. The court held and the
jury found that the shooting was too severe an act to resort to, to be
entirely justifiable, and the prisoner was sentenced to four years
imprisonment. He was pardoned, however, before the expiration of his term of
sentence. 

***********************************************************

Page 79
ORGANIZATION OF THE COUNTY. 

     Another, and probably the most important case, was that of John
Cathcart, the wife murderer.  He was found guilty of murder in the first
degree, and sentenced to be hanged.  Arrangements were making for the
execution of the sentence, and Sheriff Frederick G. Miller had ordered the
erection of the scaffold, but Cathcart defeated the ends of justice by
hanging himself about two weeks prior to the day fixed for the execution.

     The corner-stone of the new court-house was laid on Monday, the 4th day
of June, 1860. There was no public ceremony on the occasion. Within the stone
was deposited a tin box containing the names of officers of the Federal,
State, county, and borough government, ministers of the gospel residing here,
a copy of the Bible, and a number of newspapers of the past and (then)
present. Although the work of constructing the building was commenced in the
spring of 1860, the building was not completed until nearly two years later.
When partly completed it became necessary to rebuild a portion of the tower
owing to a miscalculation on the part of the architect, an uneven pressure on
the columns being the result. The interior arrangement differed materially
from that of the old court-house. Instead of having the court-room
downstairs, as was the case of the old building, that room was located in the
upper story, and the county officers’ rooms arranged below, except the
surveyor’s 
office, which is in the tower over the main entrance. On entering the front
one goes directly into a long, wide hall, extending the entire length of the
building. On the right, first the prothonotary’s office is reached, then the
county commissioner’s rooms, and beyond this the treasurer’s office, the
latter being in the addition built in 1882-83. First on the left from the
front entrance is the recorder’s office, next the old arbitration room, now
used as a justice’s office, then the office of the county superintendent, and
last the district attorney’s offices, one of which was formerly used as the
sheriff’s office. The floors are of 
asphaltum in the halls above and below. The clock was placed in the tower
mainly through the efforts of citizens of the borough. The first bell placed
in the tower was found defective, and was replaced by another, which although 
smaller than the first, was of much better metal. 

     In September, 1882, a contract was made with Messrs. Thorn & Burchfield
for the construction of an addition on the rear of the court-house, and
remodeling the roof and upper part of the former building. By this addition,
the sheriff’s present office, the large arbitration room, part of the
district attorney’s office, and closets were annexed on the ground floor. On
the floor above there was added the grand and traverse jurors’ rooms,
attorneys’ rooms, with a library room above, reached by a spiral iron
stairway, witnesses’ waiting-room, and closets. Changes were also made in the
roof to the old part, and the whole is now slated. The county officers’ rooms
are provided with a fire-proof depository for records. The building is heated
throughout with steam. The price paid the contractors for the additions made
in 1882-3 was about $35,897. 

***********************************************************

Page 80
HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY. 

The upper floor is reached by three stairways, one on either side in the
front of the building, and one in the rear leading to the attorneys' and
jurors' rooms.  The exterior presents a plain, neat, and tasteful appearance
without evidence of any elaborate architectural display.  The building was
constructed with a view to utility and convenience rather than outward
appearance and show.

     Many are the important causes tried within its walls, which have called
here some of the ablest lawyers of the State ; and among these suits, civil
and criminal, a few may appropriately be recalled. 

     Pruner and Burleigh vs. Dr. David Houtz was several times tried here
and in Centre county, and also in the United States Court. Dr Houtz will be
remembered as the founder of Houtzdale. The plaintiff was represented by John
G. Miles, esq., of Huntingdon county, one of the leading lawyers of the
State, and Hon. Joseph B. McEnally, of Clearfield. For the defense were Hon.
William A. Wallace and and Hon. H. Bucher Swoope. This was a land case and
involved a large tract in the vicinity of Houtzdale. The final determination
was a verdict in favor of the defendant. 

     In 1867 was tried the celebrated forgery case, the Commonwealth versus
Daniel Polhamus. Judge Barrett presided by special request of Judge Samuel
Linn. William A. Wallace for the Commonwealth, and H. Bucher Swoope for the
prisoner. Polhamus was convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary, but
subsequently pardoned. 

     About the same time the Hagerty will case was tried. Hagerty was an
eccentric person, and possessed a large amount of lands, two thousand acres
or thereabouts. He made large bequests to religious and charitable societies,
but died within thirty days after making his will. This made the instrument
voidable. One bequest to the Presbyterian Church society at the “ Cross
Roads,” 
was made on condition that they, in church meetings, should sing only
Rouse’s version of David’s Psalms. The will was contested, Judge McEnally
appearing for the contestants, and Senator Wallace and H. Bucher Swoope for
the executors. The suit was brought in equity, and judgment and decree
rendered in favor of the contestants. An appeal was taken to the Supreme
Court, and the judgment of the lower court affirmed. 

     The Commonwealth versus Mary Miller, indicted by the grand jury for the
murder of her husband. This case was tried before Judge Samuel Linn and a
jury. William M. McCullough and H. Bucher Swoope for the people, and William
A. Wallace and J. B. McEnally for the prisoner. Mrs. Miller was convicted and
sentenced to be hanged. The sentence was executed in the month 
of October, 1867. Mary Miller was the first person hanged in Clearfield
county. Cathcart, the wife murderer, was formally convicted and sentenced,
but suicided before the day fixed for execution of the sentence. 

     The largest verdict ever rendered in the county was in the case of
Ynicencio Casinova versus the Derby Coal Company, an action’ growing out of a
coal 

***********************************************************

Page 81 
ORGANIZATION OF THE COUNTY. 


transaction.  William A. Wallace appeared for the plaintiff, and Hon. George
R. and Walter Barett for the defendant.  Although the cause was an important
one from the amount involved, it did not attract that much attention from the
public. The verdict for the plaintiff was the sum of $285,000. 

     No case tried in the county has caused such widespread comment and
excitement as that known as the conspiracy trial. In all there were fifty-six
persons, miners in the Houtzdale region, who were organized strikers. They
were indicted for conspiracy from force of numbers by overawing the people.
Riotous acts were proved. The first case against John Maloney and fifty three 
others was tried in 1875, before Judge Orvis and a jury. Wallace, Krebs &
Fielding for the Commonwealth, and Hon. George R. Barrett and Walter Barrett,
esq., for the prisoners. They were all found guilty. Four were sentenced to
one year’s imprisonment, eight for six months, and sentence suspended as to
the balance. As every member of every organized labor society was interested
in the result, the events of the trial and verdict were telegraphed all
through the country. 

     This was followed by the trial of the remaining two offenders on that
occasion, John Siney, and Xingo Parks. Siney was not one of the strikers, but
was known as a State organizer. He came to Houtzdale and delivered an
inflammatory address, for which he was arrested. On the trial Siney was
acquitted, but Parks was found guilty of inciting unlawful assembly. He was
sentenced to one year’s imprisonment, but pardoned within a month from the
time sentence was pronounced. Judge Orvis presided. Wallace, Rrebs & Fielding
for the Commonwealth, Hon. Mattew Carpenter, of Wisconsin ; ex-Attorney
General Frank Hughes, Hon. George R. Barrett, and Walter Barrett, esq.,
counsel for the accused. 

     The Commonwealth against Martin D. Turner, for the murder of Maria
Waple, the divorced wife of Thomas Waple. The case was tried before Judge
Orvis and a jury, at the March Sessions, 18j7. Counsel for the Commonwealth,
Thomas H. Murray, Frank Fielding, and William M. McCullough. For the accused,
William A. Wallace, David L. Krebs, George R. Barrett, and Walter Barrett.
Verdict, guilty of murder in the first degree. The prisoner was sentenced to
be hanged, but on an appeal to the Supreme Court, the judgment was reversed
and a new trial ordered. The place of trial was changed from Clearfield to
Clinton county, and, on the trial thereof, the jury rendered a verdict of “
not guilty,” In Clinton county Judge Mayer presided. 

     The several suits of Bascom versus Arthurs, and the cross-suits of
Arthurs versus Bascom, in their day created some comment, and occupied the
time and attention of the courts for several terms. They were all
controversies relating to land titles. They became prominent through the
eminent counsel engaged on the trial. Bascom was represented by Hon. George
R. Barrett, Hon. J. B. McEnally, and in the early stages of the litigation,
by Hon. Isaac G. Gordon, of 

***********************************************************

Page 82
HISTORY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY. 

Brookville, Pa., and Hon. H. Bucher Swope.  The Arthurs interest was
championed by Hon. George A. Jenks, of Brookville, and the law firm of
Wallace & Krebs.

The last case of special importance was the Commonwealth versus John A.
Nevling, on an indictment charging him with the murder of Samuel Pennington,
at Houtzdale, on the 17th day of February, 1880. Nevling was found guilty and
sentenced to be hanged. The sentence was executed by Sheriff James Mahaffey,
on the 24th day of March, 1882, at Clearfield. Judge Charles A. 
Mayer presided at the trial. The counsel were, for the Commonwealth,
District-Attorney Joseph F. McKenrick, assisted by Mr. Chase, a local lawyer,
then living at Houtzdale ; and for the prisoner, Messrs. McEnally & McCurdy,
of Clearfield.