This is mnoGoSearch's cache of http://files.usgwarchives.net/pa/schuylkill/history/local/munsell/hist0001.txt. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared during last crawling. The current page could have changed in the meantime.

Last modified: Sat, 21 Jun 2008, 06:09:10 EDT    Size: 113566
Area History: History of Schuylkill County, Pa: W. W. Munsell, 1881:
Introduction and Outline History Of Pennsylvania: Pages 9-25.

Contributed for use in USGenWeb Archives by R. Steffey.
  Typing and editing by Jo Garzelloni and Carole Carr.

USGENWEB NOTICE: Printing this file by non-commercial individuals
		and libraries is encouraged, as long as all notices
		and submitter information is included. Any other use,
		including copying files to other sites requires
		permission from the submitters PRIOR to uploading to
		any other sites. We encourage links to the state and
		county table of contents.
     ____________________________________________________________

                   HISTORY OF SCHUYLKILL COUNTY, PA

            with Illustrations and Biographical Sketches
             of Some of Its Prominent Men and Pioneers.

         New York: W. W. Munsell & Co., 36 Vesey Street, 1881
           Press of George Macnamara, 36 Vesey Street, N.Y.

     ____________________________________________________________


                           Introduction.

                          _______+_______
                                 +
               _____________________________________


    In  preparing the following work for publication  information
has  been sought from every available source, and it is  believed
that many of the facts recorded have been preserved from oblivion
by being thus rescued from the failing memories of those who will
soon pass away.
    It is hardly possible that in a work like this no errors will
be  found; but it is confidently hoped that if  inaccuracies  are
discovered  the great difficulty of preventing  their  occurrence
will be considered, and that they will be regarded in a  charita-
ble rather that a censorious spirit.
    The publishers desire to acknowledge the kindness and courte-
sy  with  which their efforts to obtain the facts  recorded  here
have been almost uniformly met.  To the press, and especially  to
the editors of the Minors' Journal, of Pottsville, and the  Shen-
andoah Herald, for free access to the files of their journals; to
Colonel  Hyde, the gentlemanly librarian of the Pottsville  Athe-
naeum,  for the privileges of the library; to county and  borough
officers,  for  assistance  in examining their  records;  to  the
pastors of nearly all the churches in the county, for  assistance
in preparing the religious history; and to secretaries of  numer-
ous  societies  and lodges, for data  furnished,  their  grateful
acknowledgments are due.
    The following books have been freely consulted: Sherman Day's
and  Dr Egle's histories of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania  Archives,
Rupp's history of Schuylkill county, Dewees's and Martin's histo-
ries  of  the Mollie Maguires, the history  of  the  Pennsylvania
volunteers,  prepared under the authority of the State by  Samuel
P. Bates, LL.D.; and the Memorial of the Patriotism of Schuylkill
County, by the late Francis B. Wallace, from which last the lists
of the soldiers of the Union from Schuylkill county were taken.
    Of  those who have aided in the preparation of the  work,  or
furnished valuable information, it is a pleasure to the  publish-
ers to name the following, besides the authors of sections of the
work  who are named in connection with their contributions:   The
intelligent octogenarians, Abraham Pott, who came here at the age
of  ten,  and Jeremiah Reed, who was born here;  Judge  David  B.
Green,  Judge E.O. Parry, F.A. Mortimer, O.J. Airgood,  clerk  of
the courts, J.B. Kaercher, C.D. Arters, D.E. Miller,  Christopher
Little, John P. Bertram, William L. Whitney, John A.M.  Passmore,
George  R. Kaercher, Jesse Hawley, Rev. Dr. Bellville and  George
W. Smiley, Revs. G.A. Hinterleitner, Edward J. Koons, J.B.  Stein
and  B.F.  Patterson,  J. Wallace McCool,  Charles  Tanner,  W.B.
Staller,  Jacob S. Longacre, H.H. Brownmiller, F.G.  Faust,  H.S.
Strong,  A.L.  Boughner,  W.H. Zeller, John  Anthony,  Edward  T.
Filbert,  Rev.  E.S. Henry, John Jacob Schnoke,  J.O.  Roads  and
Richard Harington.

                  __________________________________

                            Outline History
                                  of
                              Pennsylvania.
   ________________________________________________________________

                               CHAPTER I.
                                 ____

                       THE DISCOVERY OF THE DELAWARE
           PENNSYLVANIA GRANTED TO AND ORGANIZED BY WILLIAM PENN

                                __________

    The  first  discovery of Delaware bay, and  the  river  which
forms a portion of the eastern boundary of the State of  Pennsyl-
vania appears to have been made by Hendrick Hudson, an Englishman
in the service of the Dutch, in 1609.  In August of that year  he
entered the bay, and after a short cruise in it left and preceded
to the mouth of the Hudson river, which stream he ascended as far
as Albany.
    It is said that Lord Delaware visited the bay in 1610;  hence
the  name by which it and the river are known.  It was called  by
the Dutch South river, the Hudson being termed by them the  North
river.
    Another  Dutch  navigator, Captain Mey, visited  the  bay  in
1614;  but Captain, or, as he was termed, skipper Cornelius  Hen-
drickson  first  ascended the river as far as the  mouth  of  the
Schuylkill, in 1616.
    A  short  lived settlement was made on the east bank  of  the
Delaware  under the auspices of the Dutch West India  Company  in
1623, under the direction of Captains Mey and Tienpont.   Another
settlement  was made on the bay, farther down, in 1630; but  this
was soon destroyed by the Indians, whose enmity the colonists had
indiscreetly incurred.
    Maryland  was  granted  to Lord Baltimore in  1632,  and  the
territory  on the west side of the Delaware was claimed  by  him,
and  the  disputes arising out of this claim  remained  unsettled
during many years.
    In  1638 a settlement was made on the west bank of the  Dela-
ware by a colony of Swedes, under the patronage of Queen Christi-
na.   This  colony  was under the direction of  Peter  Minuit,  a
Hollander,  who had been a director in the colony of New  Amster-
dam.   Several Swedish governors followed Minuit  in  succession;
prosperous  settlements  sprang  up along the west  bank  of  the
river,  and a thriving trade was carried on by the Swedes.   They
were watched with jealousy by the Dutch, who set up the claim  of
jurisdiction  by  reason  of former  occupation,  and  instituted
intrigues and plans to disposses the Swedes.  In 1655 a force  of
seven  vessels and six hundred men was sent up the  Delaware  for
that purpose.  The Swedish government had been kept in  ignorance
of this expedition, and it was easily successful.
    On  the  restoration of Charles the Second to the  throne  of
Great  Britain, he granted the territory now including  New  York
and  New Jersey, and afterwards that of Delaware, to his  brother
the  Duke of York.  The latter immediately sent a force  to  take
possession  of the country thus granted.  New Amsterdam and  Fort
Orange  on  the Hudson were at once possessed,  and  rechristened
respectively New York, in honor of the Duke of York, and  Albany.
A portion of the force was then dispatched to take possession  of
the Dutch colonies on the Delaware, which was accomplished almost
without  resistance.   This  dispossession of the  Dutch  by  the
English  led to a war between Great Britain and Holland,  at  the
conclusion of which the title of the former to these  territories
was  acknowledged by treaty.  The Duke of York continued in  pos-
session  of this region, undisturbed except by  the  Marylanders,
who  resorted to occasional acts of violence in order  to  assert
the claim of Lord Baltimore, until, in 1663, war again broke  out
between  Great Britain and Holland, and Dutch privateers  visited
the coast and plundered the inhabitants; and during that years  a
Dutch  squadron of vessels arrived and repossessed the  dominions
which had been granted to the Duke of York.  These were  restored
by  the  treat of Westminster in 1674, and in the same  year,  by
new patent, the title of the Duke of York was confirmed.   During
eight years following these events great changes took place among
the  proprietaries of the region, in the course of which  William
Penn, by reason of being a trustee of one of these  proprietaries
and a purchase of a portion of the territory, became quite famil-
iar with the region, as well as with the plans for its  coloniza-
tion.
    William  Penn was the son of Sir William Penn, an admiral  in
the royal navy, who at his death left a claim of

              ______________end page 9.________________

                                                         page 10

                   OUTLINE HISTORY OF PENNSYLVANIA
 ________________________________________________________________

sixteen thousand pounds against the government of Great  Britain.
Though  in  early life he was a soldier of some  distinction,  he
afterwards  became  a Quaker, and was  several  times  imprisoned
because  of his religious faith. Having become, as before  state,
familiar  with the region on the Delaware, and with  the  schemes
for its colonization, he conceived the plan of founding a  colony
there on the broad principles of equality which his faith taught.
Accordingly, in 1680, he petitioned King Charles the Second for a
grant  of a tract of land west from the Delaware river and  south
from Maryland, in liquidation of the claim which he had inherited
from  his  father.  After the discussion and arrangement  of  the
preliminaries  the petition was granted, and a charter signed  by
the king in 1681.  Penn at first desired that the province  might
be called New Wales, and when objections were raised against this
he  suggested  Sylvania.   To this the king  and  his  counselors
prefixed  Penn, for the double reason that the name would  appro-
priately  mean  high  woodlands, and that it was the  name  of  a
distinguished admiral, whose memory the king desired to honor.  A
royal  address was at once issued informing the inhabitants  that
William  Penn was the sole proprietor, and that he  was  invested
with  all the necessary governmental powers.  A proclamation  was
also  issued by William Penn to the people of his province,  set-
ting  forth the policy which he intended to adopt in the  govern-
ment of the colony.  A deputy was sent in the spring of the  same
year, with instructions to institute measures for the  management
of  affairs  and the temporary government of  the  province.   In
autumn  of the same year he sent commissioners to  make  treaties
with the Indians, and arrange for future settlement.
    South  from the province of Pennsylvania, along the  Delaware
bay,  the Duke of York was still the proprietor of  the  country.
Foreseeing the possibility of future annoyance to the commerce of
his province, Penn was desirous of acquiring this territory;  and
accordingly  entered into negotiations with the Duke of York  for
it,  and  in the autumn of 1682 he became the proprietor  of  the
land by deeds, which, however, conveyed no political rights.   In
the  autumn of 1682 Penn visited his province in the  new  world,
took  formal  possession  of the territory  along  Delaware  bay,
proceeded up the Delaware and visited the settlements along  that
river.   During this year the celebrated treaty  between  William
Penn  and  the Indians was made, it is said by  some  historians,
under  a large elm tree at Shakamaxon.  By others it is  insisted
that  no  evidence exists of any such treaty at that  place;  but
that the accounts of it that have passed into history were  drawn
largely  from  the fertile imaginatons (sic)  of  early  writers.
Whether a treaty was held there or not, it is almost certain that
during that year treaties were made between Penn and the Indians,
and it is a historical fact that between the Indians and  Quakers
perfect  faith was kept.  Voltaire said of the treaty  which  was
said  to have been made at Shakamaxon: "It was the only one  ever
made  between savages and Christians that was not ratified by  an
oath, and the only one that was never broken."
    The  three principal tribes of Indians which  then  inhabited
Pennsylvania  were the Lenni Lenapes, the Mingoes and  the  Shaw-
nees.   Their  relations with the Swedes had been of  a  friendly
character, and the pacific and kind policy of Penn and his Quaker
colonists  toward  them bore fruit in strong contrast  with  that
which the dishonest and reckless policy of other colonies, and of
the United States government in later times, has brought forth.
   The plan of the city of Philadelphia, which had been laid  out
by  the commissioners that had preceded the proprietor,  was  re-
vised by him, and the present beautiful and regular plan adopted,
and even the present names given to the principal streets.
    In  the  latter part of the year 1682 the  first  legislative
body in the province was convened by the proprietor, who,  though
he was vested with all the powers of a proprietary governor,  saw
fit,  in the furtherance of his original plan, to adopt a  purely
democratic form of government.  This body was a general  assembly
of  the  people, and was held at the town of Chester,  which  was
first  called by the Swedes Upland.  This assembly  continued  in
session  from  the fourth till the seventh  of  December;  during
which  time they enacted three laws, one of which was called  the
great  law of Pennsylvania.  It was a code of laws consisting  of
between  sixty  and seventy subjects or chapters, that  had  been
prepared  by  the proprietor in England, and it was  intended  to
cover all the exigencies which were deemed likely to arise in the
colony.   It secured the most ample religious  toleration-to  all
those  faith  agreed with that of the Friends-and  only  punished
others  by fine and imprisonment; thus exhibiting a  marked  con-
trast with the bigoted and intolerant Puritans in some of the New
England  colonies.   It guaranteed the rights and  privileges  of
citizenship to all tax-payers, guarded personal liberty, secured,
as  far  as possible, by punishing bribery, the purity  of  elec-
tions, abolished the English law of primogeniture, discarded  the
administration  of  religious oaths and affixed  the  penalty  of
perjury to false affirmation, and established marriage as a civil
contract.  Drinking healths, drunkenness, or the encouragement of
it,  spreading  false  news,  clamorousness,  scolding,  railing,
masks,  revels, stage plays, cards and other games of chance,  as
well as evil and enticing sports, were forbidden and made punish-
able  by  fine and imprisonment.  It is a curious fact  that  all
these laws have either been superseded by others or become  obso-
lete.
    The  wise,  just  and generous policy  which  the  proprietor
adopted in the government of his province rendered him exceeding-
ly  popular, and the tide of immigration set so  strongly  toward
this  province that during the year 1682 as many as  twenty-three
ships laden with settlers arrived.  During this year the proprie-
tor divided the province into the three counties of Bucks, Phila-
delphia  and Chester; and the territory, as it was termed,  which
he had acquired from the Duke of York, into Kent, New Castle  and
Sussex.  In these counties he appointed officers, and made prepa-
rations  for the election of a representative  Legislature,  con-
sisting  of  a council of eighteen members, and  an  assembly  of
fifty-four.  This Legislature assembled

              ______________end page 10.________________

                                                         page 11

               GERMAN IMMIGRATION-GOVERNMENTAL CHANGES.
 ________________________________________________________________

at  Philadelphia in January, 1682. One law enacted  provided  for
the appointment in each county court of three "peace makers,"  to
hear  and determine differences. It may be noted as a  matter  of
curiosity that bills were introduced in this Legislature  provid-
ing  that "only two sorts of clothes should be worn-one kind  for
summer and one for winter;" and another that young men should  be
obliged to marry at a certain age.

                          ________________

                              CHAPTER II
                          _________________


                       GERMAN IMMIGRATION
    THE ADMINISTRATIONS OF WILLIAM PENN AND SIR WILLIAM KEITH

    As has been before stated, the first settlements in the prov-
ince  were made by Swedes, who occupied the country during  about
half  a century previous to its purchase of William Penn. In  all
that  time  they made little progress toward developing  the  re-
sources of the country.  In the language of Watson: "They seem to
have sat down contented in their log and clay huts, their leather
breeches  and  jerkins and match coats for their men,  and  their
skin jackets and linsey petticoats for their women; but no sooner
has the genius of Penn enlisted in the enterprise than we see  it
speak  a city and commerce into existence.  His  spirit  animated
every  part of his colony; and the consequence was that the  tame
and  unaspiring Swedes soon lost their distinctive character  and
existence as a separate nation.
    Immigration  was  largely  increased during  1683  and  1684.
Settlers came from England, Ireland, Wales, Holland and  Germany.
Of  those  from the latter country many came  from  Cresheim  and
founded the village of Germantown. They were nearly all  Quakers,
and  the settlement which they made was the nucleus around  which
collected so large a German population in after years that  Penn-
sylvania  became  a German province,  notwithstanding  the  large
immigration from the British islands at first.
    In  1683 and 1684 the controversy with regard  to  boundaries
was renewed by Lord Baltimore, and the Marylanders were guilty of
some  acts  of aggression. The province had come to  number  some
7,000  inhabitants,  and it was a matter of importance  that  the
boundary  dispute should be settled. To accomplish  this  settle-
ment, and for other reasons, Penn during 1684 sailed for England,
after  giving to the provincial council the executive power.  Not
long  after his arrival in England Charles the Second  died,  and
was  succeeded on the throne by his brother James, Duke of  York,
between  whom and Penn a strong friendship existed. The  proprie-
tary,  therefore, easily obtained a favorable decree. In  1688  a
revolution in England dethroned James and placed the regal  power
in  the  hands of William and Mary.  This  change  destroyed  the
influence of Penn at the English court, and the friendship  which
had existed between him and James caused him to be regarded  with
suspicion. Slanders were circulated and believed concerning  him,
and he was even accused of treason and compelled for a time to go
into retirement.  In his absence discord and dissensions arose in
the  province, and these were made the pretext for depriving  him
of his proprietary government in 1693. He was, however, honorably
acquitted  and exonerated from suspicion, and reinstated  in  his
proprietary  rights in 1694. Dissensions in the province  contin-
ued,  however, till after the return of the proprietary with  his
family  in 1699; and even his presence failed to  wholly  restore
harmony.
     Because  of the increasing power of the  proprietary govern-
ments  in America, the plan had, since the accession  of  William
and  Mary  to  the crown, been entertained  of  purchasing  these
governments and converting them into regal ones.  In 1701 a  bill
for  that purpose was introduced in the House of Lords, and  Penn
revisited  England for the purpose of endeavoring to prevent  its
passage. Before his departure a new constitution was adopted, and
a deputy governor and council of State provided for and  appoint-
ed.  On  his arrival the project of  purchasing  the  proprietary
government  was  dropped.   In 1702 King William  died,  and  was
succeeded by Queen Anne, who entertained for Penn a warm  friend-
ship.  Though the danger of being dispossessed of his proprietary
government  were  not more harmonious.  The disaffection  on  the
part of the people in the lower counties, Which he had endeavored
to  allay, led to a separation in 1703, and the choice of a  dis-
tinct assembly for the territories.  Some of the deputy governors
were indiscreet men, and differences between them and the provin-
cial  Legislature were constantly arising.  Harrassed  by  these,
and  probably  disgusted at the ingratitude of his  subjects,  in
whose behalf he had incurred large pecuniary liabilities, for the
collection  of  which  proceedings  were  frequently   instituted
against him, he finally agreed with the crown for the cession  of
his  province and the territory granted him by the Duke of  York.
He  was  prevented from legally consummating this  cession  by  a
stroke of apoplexy, which rendered him imbecile.
   The Queen died in 1714, and was succeeded by George the First.
Among the early acts of Parliament in the reign of this King  was
one extending to the English colonies a previous act  disqualify-
ing  Quakers  from holding office, serving on juries,  or  giving
evidence in criminal case.  Charles Gookin, who had been  provin-
cial governor since 1709, construed this act to be applicable  to
the proprietary government, and a disqualification of the Quakers
in  the province.  This construction of the law of course  called
forth  the indignation and opposition of the council, the  Assem-
bly, and the people, and led to the recall of Gookin in 1717, and
the  appointment of Sir William Keith in his stead.   The  latter
was affable and courteous, cunning and crafty, and in all matters
of

                ___________end page 11.____________


                                                         page 12

                   OUTLINE HISTORY OF PENNSYLVANIA
 ________________________________________________________________

difference between the crown or proprietary, on one side, and the
people on the other, he espoused the popular cause.
    William  Penn died at the age of seventy-four, in the  summer
of  1718. History will ever point to him as one who  accomplished
more for the cause  of civil and religious liberty than any other
man of his time, and to the provincial government which he found-
ed  and  administered as the first successful experiment  in  the
broadest liberty of conscience which had then been conceived, and
the nearest approach to a government of themselves by the  people
that  had  ever been attempted.  He was the representative  of  a
despised and proscribed sect; but by his wise and liberal  admin-
istration  of the government of his province, in accordance  with
the  principles  of  that sect, he did more to bring  it  to  the
favorable  notice  of the world than could  otherwise  have  been
done.
    The American colonies at that time presented a curious  spec-
tacle.  Maryland, a colony of Catholics, who were stigmatized  as
the  most  bigoted and intolerant sect in Christendom,  had  been
established under a constitution the most liberal and tolerant of
all that had been granted by the government of Great Britain; and
Pennsylvania, a province of Quakers, whose tenets were almost the
reverse  of  the Catholics, had added to  this  almost  universal
tolerance the largest civil liberty that had ever been enjoyed by
a  people; awhile the Puritans of the New England  colonies,  who
professed to have fled from religious persecution in England, and
to have sought an asylum where each could worship God, the common
Father  of all, according to the dictates of his own  conscience,
in  the  language of Egle, "excluded from the benefits  of  their
government  all of their government all who were not  members  of
their  church, and piously flagellated or hanged those  who  were
not  convinced of its infallibility."  Almost two  centuries have
Penn  established  his  colony in America,  and-except  in  those
governments  that  are  purely secular, or nearly  so,  in  their
character-political  science has developed little that is  essen-
tial  to the welfare and happiness of humanity that was  not  em-
bodied in his system.
    The estate of William Penn passed at his death to his family,
who  inherited both his property and his proprietary  government.
He had made a will, previous to his agreement with Queen Ann, for
the  sale  of his province; and his agreement was decided  to  be
void  because  of his mental incapacity to  consummate  it.   The
proprietary  government,  therefore, devolved on  his  widow,  as
executrix of his will and of his property during the minority  of
his  children,  and it has been said of her that  she  manifested
much  shrewdness  in  the appointment of  governors  and  general
management  of colonial affairs.  It is said by Day: "The  affec-
tion  patriarchal relation which had subsisted between  Penn  and
his  colony ceased with his death; the interest which his  family
took  in  the affairs of the province was more mercenary  in  its
character, and looked less to be establishment of great and  pure
principles of life and government."
    The administration of Sir William Keith was quite successful.
The favor with which he was regarded by the people enabled him to
promote among them that harmony which is so essential to prosper-
ity; and the colony was prosperous.  There was a large influx  of
population, the character of which was more cosmopolitan than  in
former  times.  The persecutions of the Quakers  in  England  had
relaxed  somewhat,  and fewer, relatively, of them  sought  homes
here; while people from other regions, and notably from  Germany,
came  in great numbers. The popularity of Keith was such that  he
was able to accomplish two measures that had been looked on  with
great  disfavor by the assembly-the establishment of a  Court  of
Chancery, of which he was the chancellor; and the organization of
a militia, of which he was the chief.  On the other hand, by  his
good offices, "the Quakers, to their great joy, procured a renew-
al  of the privilege of affirmation in place of an oath,  and  of
the cherished privilege of wearing the hat whenever and  wherever
it suited them," He was deposed in 1726, through the influence of
James Logan, the leader of the proprietary party. Franklin  wrote
of  him: "If he sought popularity he promoted the  public  happi-
ness, and his courage in resisting the demands of the family  may
be ascribed to a higher emotive than private interest.  The  con-
duct  of the Assembly toward him was neither honorable nor  poli-
tic;  for  his sins against his principles were  virtues  to  the
people,  with  whom he was deservedly a favorite; and  the  House
should  have given him such substantial marks of their  gratitude
as would have tempted his successors to walk in his steps."
     Keith's  successor  was Patrick Gordon.  His  administration
continued during ten years, or until his death in 1736. Tranquil-
lity prevailed in the province during this time; the  population,
which in 1727 was more than fifty thousand, received large acces-
sions, especially from Germany; internal improvements were prose-
cuted,  and foreign commerce increased largely.  Two of the  pro-
prietaries,  John  and  Thomas Penn, came to  the  province;  the
latter in 1732, the former in 1734.  John returned to England  in
1735 on account of the aggressions of the Marylanders under  Lord
Baltimore, but Thomas remained in the country eight years longer.
The  demeanor of the latter was not such as to endear him to  the
people.
    The first public library ever established in the province was
projected  in 1731 by Benjamin Franklin, and was incorporated  in
1742.  During the two years following the death of Mr. Gordon the
president of the council, James Logan, was the executive  officer
of the province. The celebrated fraud known as the "Indian  Walk"
took place in 1737.  That an unscrupulous Indian trader should be
guilty  of thus swindling ignorant savages would be no matter  of
surprise; but that the province of Pennsylvania should be a party
to  such a transaction is almost incredible.  It is certain  that
it never would have received the sanction of William Penn, and it
is  equally certain that it was the foundation of an enmity  that
broke out in open hostility afterwards.

               _____________end page 12.______________


                                                       page 13

               OPENING OF THE FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR.
 ______________________________________________________________

                             CHAPTER III.
                              _________

            THE QUESTION OF TAXING THE PROPRIETARY ESTATES
                  WARS WITH THE FRENCH AND INDIANS
                       ______________________

    The  proprietaries in 1738 appointed George Thomas  governor,
and  the position was held by him till 1747.  In the war  between
Great  Britain and Spain which was declared in 1739 the  assembly
did not take measures to furnish the men required, and the gover-
nor  was compelled to raise the quota of the province by his  own
exertions. In 1744 war broke out between France and England,  and
the  aspect of Indian affairs in Pennsylvania and on its  borders
became threatening; but the storm was averted by the good offices
of the Iroquois, who held the Delawares in subjection.
    An  unhappy  condition of affairs existed at that  time,  and
during some years afterwards, in the province. The  proprietaries
had little sympathy with the people, but as they grew rich by the
enhanced value which the activity and enterprise of these  people
gave  to  their estates, they preferred the pomp  and  luxury  of
aristocratic  life,  and regarded the people with  a  measure  of
contempt.  Under such circumstances it was not a matter of wonder
that the people, through their representative, should not respond
with alacrity to the demands of the governors appointed by  these
proprietaries.  Governor  Thomas resigned in 1747, and  after  an
administration  of two years by Anthony Palmer, president of  the
council, James Hamilton became  lieutenant governor in 1749.  The
condition of things at that time cannot be better described  than
in the language of Sherman Day:
    "An  alarming  crisis was at hand. The French,  now  hovering
around  the great lakes, sedulously applied themselves to  seduce
the Indians from their allegiance to the English. The Shawnee had
already joined them; the Delawares waited only for an opportunity
to  revenge their wrongs, and of the Six Nations  the  Onondagas,
Cayugas,  and Senecas were wavering.  The French were  fortifying
the  strong points on the Ohio.  To keep the Indians in favor  of
the  colony required much cunning diplomacy, and expensive  pres-
nts.  In this alarming juncture the old flame of civil dissension
burst out with increased force. The presents to the Indians, with
the erection of a line of forts along the frontier, and the maint-
enance of a military force, drew heavily on the provincial purse.
The Assembly, the popular branch, urged that the proprietary est-
ates should be taxed as well as those of humble individuals.  The
proprietors, through their deputies, refused, and pleaded peroga-
tive,  charter, and laws. The Assembly in turn  pleading  equity,
common  danger, and common benefit, requiring a  common  expense.
The  proprietaries offered bounties in lands yet to be  conquered
from the Indians, and the privilege of issuing more paper  money;
the Assembly wanted something more tangible.  The Assembly passed
laws laying taxes and granting supplies, but annexing conditions.
The governors opposed the conditions, but were willing to aid the
Assembly  in taxiing the people, but not the proprietaries.  Here
were  the  germs of revolution, not fully  matured  until  twenty
years  later. Dr. Franklin was now a member and a leader  in  the
Assembly.  In the meantime the frontier were left  exposed  while
these frivolous disputes continued. The pacific principles,  too,
of  the Quakers and Dunkards and Mennonists  and  Schwenckfelders
came  in  to complicate the strife; but as the  danger  increased
they prudently kept aloof from public office, leaving the manage-
ment of the war to sects less scrupulous."
    Robert  H.  Morris, the successor of James  Hamilton,  became
governor in 1754, and his successor, William Denny, in 1756.  The
same  want  of harmony between the proprietaries and  the  people
continued during their administrations, but finally, through  the
efforts  of Franklin, the royal assent was given to a law  taxing
the estates of the proprietaries.
    Settlements were made on lands to which the Indian title  had
not  been  extinguished, especially by the  not  over  scrupulous
Scotch  Irish, and the result was a desultory Indian  war,  which
kept up a very insecure feeling among the people of the province.
    Such was the condition of the province at the breaking out of
the French and Indian war a few years after the treaty of Aix-La-
Chapelle, which really was scarcely more than a temporary suspen-
sion  of  hostilities.  It is well known to every  one  connected
with  America history, that at this time the French attempted  to
connect  their possessions in Canada and Louisiana by a chain  of
military  posts  extending from Presque Isle, now  Erie,  to  the
navigable waters of the Ohio, and along that river to the Missis-
sippi.  In furtherance of this design they sent, in  1754,  1,000
men  to the confluence of the Allegheny and  Monongahela  rivers,
where they built Fort DuQuesne, afterward, Fort Pitt; now  Pitts-
burg.  Against this was sent the disastrous expedition of General
Barrack, a minute account of which cannot, for want of space,  be
given  here.  It may briefly be said, that by reason  of  hisself
here. It may briefly be said, that by reason of his self  conceit
and  obstinacy  General Barrack sustained the  most  overwhelming
defeat that an European army had ever met in America, and that he
was mortally wounded in this action.  General-then Colonel-George
Washington greatly distinguished himself in this battle.
    The  dispute between the proprietaries and people  continued,
notwithstanding the country was suffering from the horrors of  an
Indian war. The proprietaries insisted on the exemption of  their
estates  from taxation, and the Assembly yielded when the  public
safety  was  in  jeopardy. Several councils were  held  with  the
Indians,  and efforts were made through the interposition of  the
Six  Nations, whose aid the authorities of the province  invoked,
to secure peace, with only partial success. In 1756 three hundred
men under Colonel Armstrong crossed

              _____________end page 13._______________

                                                         page 14

                  OUTLINE HISTORY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  ______________________________________________________________

the Alleghenies and destroyed the Indian town of Kittaning; thus
inflicting a severe blow on the savages, and driving them beyond
the Allegheny river.
    In  1758  a change in the ministry in England was  made,  and
under  William Pitt the war was prosecuted with great energy.  An
expedition  consisting of about 9,000 men was organized and  sent
against  Fort DuQuesne.  On the approach of this army the  French
burnt  the buildings, evacuated the fort, and blew up  the  maga-
zine.  It was rebuilt and named Fort Pitt.  This terminated  hos-
tilities  in the valley of the Ohio.  A series of successes  fol-
lowed  in 1759 and 1760 at the north and west,  which  terminated
the  war,  though a feeble effort was made by the French  to  re-
trieve their losses in Canada.  The result was the final  extinc-
tion of the French dominion in the Canadian provinces, which  was
confirmed by the treaty of Fontainbleau in 1762.  The Kyasuta and
Pontiac war, so called from the chiefs who planned it, broke  out
in  1763. Kyasuta was a Seneca, and Pontiac an Ottawa chief;  and
the  scheme which they devised, for a war of quick  extermination
against the colonists, would have been no discredit to the abili-
ty of educated military chieftains.  The savages had looked  with
approval  on the construction by the French of a chain  of  forts
from Presque Isle to the Ohio; for they saw in them a check  upon
the progress westward of the tide of settlement which  threatened
to  dispossess them of their broad domains.  When they saw  these
forts fall into the hands of the colonists, and thus cease to  be
a barrier against their aggressions, they became more alarmed for
their own safety; and these wily chiefs conceived the project  of
attacking and overpowering the different defenses on the frontier
simultaneously,  and  then  rushing upon  and  exterminating  the
defenseless  inhabitants  in the settlements, and  thus,  by  the
terror which they inspired, preventing future encroachments.  The
time of harvest was chosen for this attack, and the plan was laid
with such secrecy that the first intimation of it was the appall-
ing war whoop with which it was commenced.  So nearly  successful
were  the savages that eight of the eleven forts attacked on  the
western  frontier were taken. Scalping parties overran the  fron-
tier settlements of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia, and  the
terror  stricken  inhabitants  fled before them.  Fort  Pitt  was
invested,  after the Indian fashion, during about  three  months,
but was relieved by force under Colonel Boquet.  About thirty  of
the  settlers in Wyoming valley were killed by the Delawares,  in
revenge for the murder of Teedyuscung by a party of Iroquois, the
latter having persuaded the Delawares that the murder was commit-
ted by the whites.  Although there were, after the first eruption
of hostilities, no large organized bands of hostile Indians,  the
frontier settlements were continually harassed by the authorities
in the province against these marauding parties was insufficient.
The  pacific disposition of the Quakers, who controlled the  gov-
ernment,  was  such as to call forth the remark  that  they  were
"more solicitous for the welfare of the bloodthirsty Indian  than
for  the lives of the frontiersmen." Parkman says of them:  "They
seemed resolved that they would neither defend the people of  the
frontier  nor  allow them to defend  themselves;  and  vehemently
inveighed  against all expeditions to cut off the Indian  maraud-
ers.  Their  security was owing to their local  situation,  being
confined  to  the  eastern part of the  province.   "They  seemed
resolved hat they would neither defend the people of the frontier
nor  allow  them to defend themselves; and  vehemently  inveighed
against  all expeditions to cut off the Indian  marauders.  Their
security  was owing to their local situation, being  confined  to
the eastern part of the province."
     John  Penn, a grandson of the founder of the province,  came
to  Pennsylvania in 1763 in the capacity of  lieutenant-governor.
His father and his uncle were then the proprietors and resided in
England.   The Penn family had all ceased to be Quakers, and  had
no  conscientious scruples against defensive or  aggressive  war.
General  Gage had become commander of the military forces of  the
province,  and Governor Penn vigorously seconded his efforts.  He
even, in 1764, offered by proclamation the following bounties for
scalps, Indians, etc.: "For every male above the age of ten years
captured,  $150;  scalped, being killed, $164; for  every  female
Indian  enemy,  and every male under the age of ten  years,  cap-
tured, $130; for every female above the age of ten years scalped,
being killed, $50."
    The apathy which was manifested by the Assembly in 1763,  and
the  insecure condition of the settlers toward the frontier,  led
to  the  formation of an independent organization  known  as  the
Paxtang  Boys  or  Paxtang Rangers; so named  because  they  were
mostly  inhabitants of Paxtang, or Paxton, and Donnegal, in  Lan-
caster  county.  Such was the feeling of insecurity  in  advanced
settlements that men were compelled to keep their rifles at their
sides  while  at work in their fields, and even  while  attending
divine  worship. These rangers, by their vigilance and  activity,
and  by the severe punishments which they inflicted on  the  sav-
ages, became in turn a terror to them.  They were mostly composed
of  Scotch-Irish Presbyterians,  between whom and the Quakers  no
very friendly feeling existed.  The latter strongly censored what
they  termed the barbarities of the rangers; and  fierce  dissen-
sions  arose between them.  The Paxtang men finally fell  upon  a
small tribe of Indians at Conestoga, in Lancaster county, and put
many  of  them  of to death, because as they  alleged,  they  had
discovered  that  these Indians, while  professing  friendliness,
were  secretly harboring their hostile brethren,  and  furnishing
them with information and supplies of ammunition, etc.  They also
insisted  that the Christian or Moravian Indians were  guilty  of
the  same  treachery, and the latter were compelled  to  flee  to
Philadelphia  to  avoid their vengeance.  These acts  of  rangers
called forth the still more vehement protests of the Quakers, and
even  at the present day historians are not agreed as to  whether
or  not  their action was justifiable.  None of  them  were  ever
convicted  in the courts of the province.  

    In 1764  General  Gage instituted  measures to drive the Ind-
ians from the  frontiers  by carrying the war into their country.
He sent a corps under Colonel  Bradstreet to act against the Wya-
ndots, Chippewas and Ottawas, in the vicinity of upper lakes; and
another, under  Colonel Boquet, to go to the Muskingum and attack
the Delawares,

              _____________end page 14._______________

                                                        page 15

         MASON AND DIXON'S LINE-CAUSES OF THE REVOLUTION.
 _______________________________________________________________

Shawnees, and other nations between the Ohio and the lakes.  This
vigorous action had the desired effect. Peace was established and
many of the captives who had been taken were restored.

                          _______________

                            CHAPTER IV.
                           _____________

                      "MASON AND DIXON'S LINE"
                       CAUSES OF THE REVOLUTION
                    PATRIOTIC ACTION OF PENNSYLVANIA
               ________________________________________

    During  the ten years between 1765 and 1775 two questions  of
boundary were settled.  One, that of the line between  Pennsylva-
nia and Maryland, had long been entered into for its  settlement.
In  1763  Thomas and Richard Penn and  Frederick  Lord  Baltimore
entered  into an arrangement for the establishment of this  line,
and  commissioned Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon to survey  and
mark  it.  This work they completed in 1767, having surveyed  and
marked  with  milestones  of oolite (brought  from  England)  the
southern boundary of Pennsylvania, except about twenty-two  miles
at  its  western  end, where they were prevented  by  the  Indian
proprietors.  Thus originated the celebrated "Mason  and  Dixon's
line."   The other boundary question was raised by Lord  Dunmore,
of  Virginia,  who claimed the territory that  now  includes  the
counties of Fayette, Greene and Washington, and even a portion of
Allegheny.  He  encouraged  settlers to take  from  Virginia  the
titles  to  their  lands there, and even sent an  agent  to  take
possession  of Fort Pitt, when it was evacuated by General  Gage.
The settler were a bad class of men; and by reason of the lawless
acts  of  some,  especially two named Cresap  and  Greathouse,  a
frontier  Indian war occurred.  The Virginia claim  was  promptly
repelled.
     At the conclusion of the Indian war of 1763 and 1764 the old
controversy  concerning the taxation of the  proprietary  estates
was revived, and Dr. Franklin at once became the champion of  the
popular cause in the Assembly.  That body became so indignant  at
the  conduct of the governor that they resolved to  petition  the
King  to  purchase the proprietary jurisdiction,  and  place  the
province  in  direct relation with the crown. "Here",  says  Day,
"was a most important step toward the Revolution.  To break  down
the  feudal power, and bring the people and the crown  in  direct
communication, is, in all countries, the first great step  toward
popular  freedom,  and  prepares the way for  the  next  step-the
direct  conflict  between the crown and the people.  It  so  hap-
pened, however, that, in this case the avarice of British  minis-
try  outran  the  anti-feudal propensities  of  the  people,  and
brought  the colonies at once to the last great struggle  between
the people and the crown." Dr. Franklin was sent by the  province
to London to urge before the ministry the measure of relief  from
the  proprietary dominion; but on his arrival he found  that  the
conflict  was with the very power the protection of which he  had
come to invoke.
    The  wars which had raged in the colonies, and in  which  the
home  government  had assisted, had called the attention  of  the
ministry to the rapidly increasing wealth of those colonies.  The
plan was conceived of making that wealth available her  exhausted
treasury  and  securing  the exclusive control  of  the  colonial
trade.  The  accomplishment of this double  object  involves  the
question  of taxation without consent and without  representation
in the legislative body imposing the tax.  This was the point  of
which the American Revolution turned.  Parliament insisted on its
right to tax any part of the British dominions, and the colony is
held  that they were not safe if they might thus be despoiled  of
their  property  without their consent, and by  a  parliament  in
which  they  were  not represented.  In view  of  this  momentous
question  the contentions with the proprietaries were  forgotten.
In 1764 an act was passed imposing duties on certain articles not
produced in his majesty's dominions.  This was followed the  next
year by the odious stamp act, which eclared instruments of  writ-
ing void if not written on stamped paper on which a duty was aid.
This was resisted and the paper refused in the colonies, and  the
determination was formed by the colonies to establish  manufacto-
ries,  to the end that they might not be dependent on the  mother
country.  By reason of the consequent clamors of English manufac-
turers,  and  the impossibility of executing the  law  without  a
resort  to force, the stamp act was repealed was coupled  with  a
declaration  of the absolute power of parliament over  the  colo-
nies.
    The next offensive act was the imposition of duties on  goods
imported  from Great Britain; but this was resisted by the  colo-
nists, who would accede to nothing which involved taxation  with-
out  consent.  A circular was addressed by Massachusetts  to  her
sister  colonies recapitulating their grievances, and  the  argu-
ments against the oppressive acts.  Governor Penn was ordered  by
the  colonial  secretary in London to urge upon  the  Assembly  a
disregard  of this, and, in case this advice was not  heeded,  to
prorogue it.  The Assembly  asserted, by resolution, its right to
sit  at its own pleasure, and to consult with the other  colonies
concerning matters pertaining to the welfare of all; and it  gave
a cordial assent to the recommendation by Virginia for a  concert
of action in order to peacefully obtain a redress of their griev-
ances.  The  impost was reduced in 1769, and in  1770  abolished,
except that on tea, which was continued at three pence per pound.
The  colonists, however, were opposed to the principle  on  which
the tax was based, and not to its amount, and their resistance to
the  importation of taxed goods was concentrated on the tea  tax.
In  Pennsylvania  one chest was imported and the duty  paid;  but
generally the nonimportation policy prevailed.  Under these  cir-
cumstances the ideal right of taxation was asserted and no colli-
sion was provoked. In order to make a practical

              ______________end page 15________________

                                                         page 16

                   OUTLINE HISTORY OF PENNSYLVANIA.
 ________________________________________________________________

application  of this right, however, East India Company  was  en-
couraged  by parliament to send a consignment of tea to  each  of
the  principal  ports in the colonies, to be disposed of  by  the
agents  appointed  by the company, and thus to force  it  on  the
people. The colonists in all the provinces were indignant at this
insidious attempt.
    "The  course  of Pennsylvania was from the  first  firm,  but
temperate. A meeting at Philadelphia passed resolutions  denounc-
ing the duty on tea as a tax without their consent, laid for  the
express  purpose of establishing the right to tax; and  asserting
that  this method of providing a revenue for the support of  gov-
ernment,  the administration of justice and defense of the  colo-
nies,  had a direct tendency to render assemblies useless and  to
introduce  arbitrary  government  and slavery;  and  that  steady
opposition  to  this  plan was necessary to  preserve   even  the
shadow  of liberty. They denounced all who should aid in  landing
or selling the tea as enemies to their country, and enjoined  the
consignees  to resign their appointment." Under such  a  pressure
the  consignees  declined to receive it.  In  Charleston  it  was
landed  in a damp warehouse and permitted to rot.  At New York  a
vigilance committee forbade the pilots to bring the vessel having
the  tea  on board into the harbor, and escorted  a  captain  who
attempted  to bring in some as a private venture out of the  har-
bor,  after  airing and watering his tea.  At Boston  the  vessel
having  the tea on board was boarded by a party of men  disguised
as  Indians,  and the tea thrown overboard.   In  consequence  of
these proceedings measures were adopted by the British government
to coerce submission on the part of the colonists. Upon Massachu-
setts,  which  had manifested the most  violent  opposition,  the
vials of British wrath were most freely poured out.  In 1774  the
act  known as the Boston port bill, by which the port  of  Boston
was  closed  and the custom house removed to Salem,  was  passed.
This  was  soon  followed by an act vesting  the  appointment  of
colonial  officers  in  the crown; by  another,  authorizing  the
extradition  for trial of persons charged with capital  offences;
and by still another, for quartering soldiers in the inhabitants.
All  the colonies sympathized and made common cause  with  Boston
and  Massachusetts, though in each colony there were some  people
who sympathized with the crown.  These were termed tories,  while
the advocates of colonial rights were called whigs-names by which
the two parties were known through the Revolution.
    The  province of Pennsylvania did not waver at this  juncture
in  its  adhesion to the colonial cause.  On being  requested  to
convene  the  Assembly Governor Penn of course  declined,  and  a
meeting  consisting of about eight thousand people was  held,  at
which a general colonial congress was recommended and a committee
of correspondence appointed.  Subsequently a convention of  dele-
gates from all the counties in the province assembled, at which a
series  of  temperate  but firm and  patriotic  resolutions  were
adopted,  asserting  both  their loyalty and  their  rights,  and
reiterating the recommendation for a general congress.  The  con-
vention also adopted instructions to the Assembly that was  about
to convene.  These written by John Dickinson, one of the foremost
patriots  in the province. The following extracts are  quoted  to
show the animus of these patriots:    "Honor, Justice and Humani-
ty call upon us to hold and transmit to our posterity that liber-
ty  which we received from our ancestors.  It is not our duty  to
leave wealth to our children, but it is our duty to leave liberty
to  them.  No infamy, iniquity or cruelty can exceed our  own  if
we,  born and educated in a country of freedom, entitled  to  its
blessings and knowing their value, pusillanimously deserting  the
post  assigned  us  by Divine  Providence,  surrender  succeeding
generations  to a condition of wretchedness from which  no  human
efforts,  in  all probability, will be  sufficient  to  extricate
them; the experience of all States mournfully demonstrating to us
that when arbitrary power has been established over them even the
wisest  and bravest nations that have ever flourished have  in  a
few years degenerated into abject and wretched vassals. * * *  To
us, therefore, it appears at this alarming period our duty to our
God, our country, to ourselves and to our posterity, to exert our
utmost  ability  in promoting and  establishing  harmony  between
Great  Britain  and these colonies, on  a  constitutional  found-
ation."  "Thus," says Sherman Day, "with loyalty on  their  lips,
but  with  the spirit of resistance in their  hearts,  did  these
patriots push forward the Revolution".
   The Assembly appointed delegates to the Congress, which met in
September  at  Philadelphia.  This Congress  adopted  resolutions
approving  of the resistance of the people of Massachusetts,  and
took measures to prohibit imports from or exports to Great  Brit-
ain, unless grievances were redressed.  It also adopted a  decla-
ration of rights and enumeration of grievances, an address to the
people of Great Britain, another to the people of British America
and  a loyal address to the crown.  It also adopted  articles  of
confederation, which act may rightly be considered the  beginning
of the American Union.  A bill was adopted by parliament  prohib-
iting  the people of the provinces from fishing on the  banks  of
Newfoundland,  and at about the same time an  ingeniously  framed
act,  which made apparent concessions, but retained the  doctrine
against  which the colonies contended, and which was intended  to
divide  them.  Pennsylvania was the first colony  to  which  this
proposition  was  presented, and the first colony to  which  this
proposition  was  presented,  and the Assembly, to  whom  it  was
presented by Governor Penn, promptly rejected it; declaring  that
they  desired no benefits for themselves the acceptance of  which
might injure the common cause, "and which by a generous rejection
for the present might be finally secured for all."
    Another  provincial  convention was held in  Philadelphia  in
January, 1775, at which resolutions were adopted recommending the
strict enforcement of the non-importation pledge, and the produc-
tion  and manufacture of every thing required for the use of  the
inhabitants;  enumerating many of the articles to be produced  or
manufactured, including gunpowder, which was said to be necessary
for the Indian trade.

              _____________end page 16._______________

                                                         page 17

                  END OF THE PROPRIETARY GOVERNMENT
                      EARLY REVOLUTIONARY EVENTS
_________________________________________________________________

                              CHAPTER V.
                            _____________

               REVOLUTION IN THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT
           PENNSYLVANIA A STATE-BATTLES OF 1776 AND 1777
                            INDIAN WARFARE
                            ______________

    In 1775, hostilities commenced. The battles of Lexington  and
Bunker Hill were fought, and a British army invaded the  country.
Congress met and organized an army, at the head of which  General
Washington was placed. At the same time that it thus provided for
the public defense, it adopted a "humble and dutiful petition  to
the  King," which was presented but to which was were  in  formed
no answer would be given. A military association, having branches
in  each  county, was formed, with a full code of rules  for  its
government. The Assembly met and made provision for raising  four
thousand three hundred troops-the quota of the province.  In view
of  the  troublesome  position which the  Quakers  occupied,  the
Assembly  enacted  that all able-bodied men who refused  to  bear
arms (ministers and purchase servants excepted) should contribute
an equivalent for the time and expense of others in acquiring the
necessary discipline.
    A  committee of safety was appointed which assumed  executive
functions.  A  provincial navy was equipped,  and  measures  were
taken  to protect Philadelphia against any naval force  ascending
the  Delaware river.  Later a continental navy  was  established.
    The  Continental  Congress  during its  session of May, 1775,
recommended  to those colonies where no government sufficient to 
meet the exigencies of the times existed, to adopt such  governm-
ents.  It was determined by the whigs, in pursuance of this  res-
olution, to throw off the proprietary government, by which   they
were  hampered.  The conservatives and Tories opposed  this,  but
the times  were  revolutionary and the whigs prevailed.  It   was
resolved   that  the  new government  should  emanate  from   the
people,  and   that   the Assembly, the members  of  which   were
shackled  by their  oaths of allegiance to the crown, should have
no voice  in its formation.  A convention consisting of delegates
from  all  the countries,  for the formation of a  new  constitu-
tion, was  called, through the committee of conference and obser-
vation  of   Philadelphia.  In the choice of  delegates  to  this
convention no  one  was permitted  to  vote who refused to abjure
all  allegiance  to  the King of Great Britain, or who  was  sus-
pected of being an enemy  to American liberty.
    The  Declaration of Independence was adopted July 4th,  1776,
and  this convention assembled on the 15th of the same month.  It
not  only  entered  on the task of forming  a  constitution,  but
assumed  legislative powers and appointed delegates to  Congress.
It  may here be remarked that such of these delegates as had  not
already  done so affixed their signatures to the  Declaration  of
Independence.
    The  work  of  the convention was completed on  the  28th  of
September,  and  the  new-formed constitution  committed  to  the
keeping of the council of safety until the meeting of the General
Assembly  of the State.  The provincial Assembly met on the  23rd
of  the same month, and quietly expired, with a feeble  denuncia-
tion on its lips of the assumed legislative power of the  conven-
tion.   Thus, at about the same time, the proprietary  government
in  Pennsylvania ceased by the action of the people in the  prov-
ince, and the colonies cast off their allegiance to the crown  of
Great Britain.
    The population of Pennsylvania was about 3000,000 at the time
when it became a State and assumed its position among its sisters
States in the American Union. The Declaration of Independence had
been  made, but that independence was to be maintained;  and,  as
subsequently proved, by the sacrifice of many lives and the expe-
nditure of much treasure.
    The limits of this sketch will not permit a detail of Revolu-
tionary events that occurred beyond the boundaries of the  State,
though many of those events were important factors in the history
of the State at that time, and of the events of which  Pennsylva-
nia was the theatre little more than a brief mention can be made.
    December, 1776, found General Washington on the west bank  of
the  Delaware near Trenton. He had crossed New Jersey before  the
advancing  army of General Howe, who was posted on  the  opposite
side  of the river, waiting for the formation of ice on which  to
cross,  that he might move on Philadelphia.   General  Washington
had  secured all the boats on the river, and on the night of  the
25th  of  December he recrossed the river with 2,400  men  twenty
pieces of artillery, attacked the Hessians in Trenton and defeat-
ed  them,  capturing six cannon and 900 prisoners, with  whom  he
again  crossed into Pennsylvania.  The loss of Americans in  this
action  was  two soldiers killed and two who  perished  by  cold.
General  Washington  at once returned to Trenton,  where  he  was
joined by about 3,000 Pennsylvania militia under General  Mifflin
and  Cadwallader. The battle of Princeton was fought soon  after-
ward,  and the army went into winter quarters at Morristown,  New
Jersey.  The  next summer, after some manoeuvring  (sic)  in  New
Jersey,  evidently for the purpose of drawing General  Washington
from his  position, General Howe embarked his forces at New York,
intending  to attack Philadelphia by way of the  Delaware  river.
After  entering Delaware bay he returned to the ocean, sailed  up
the Chesapeake bay and landed near the head of Elk river.  On the
sailing  of  the British army from New  York  General  Washington
moved his army into Pennsylvania, and encamped near Germantown to
watch the development of General Howe's plans.  General LaFayette
joined  General Washington at that time, and shared with him  the
hard ships and privations of camp.
    The army of General Howe advanced toward Philadelphia and was
met by that of General Washington at

          _________________end page 17.__________________

                                                          page 18

                  OUTLINE HISTORY OF PENNSYLVANIA.
_________________________________________________________________

the Brandywine, where a battle was fought the 11th of  September,
and the American forces suffered a defeat and retired to  German-
town.  Washington soon afterward crossed the Schuylkill and  pre-
pared  for  battle again, but a heavy rain  storm  prevented  the
action.  General Howe entered Philadelphia with a portion of  his
army,  and  the balance encamped at Germantown. Upon  this  force
Washington made an unsuccessful attack while a portion of it  was
assisting  the British shipping to effect a passage  through  the
Delaware  river. This was early in October.  On the 22nd  of  the
same  month an attack was made on Forts Mifflin and Mercer,  com-
manded  the Delaware opposite the mouth of the Schuylkill.  After
an obstinate resistance the garrison of these forts was compelled
to  evacuate  them.  In this affair the enemy lost two  ships  by
reason of the effective service of the Pennsylvania Street fleet.
After  the surrender of General Burgoyne at Saratoga the army  of
Washington  was reinforced by that of General Gates, and  it  en-
camped  in a strong position at Whitemarsh.  From  this  position
the British commander endeavored to draw General Washington,  but
without  success.  The  American army finally  went  into  winter
quarters at Valley Forge, a place which will ever be noted as the
scene  of  the  most intense suffering  which  the  Revolutionary
patriots  were  called  on to endure during  their  struggle  for
independence.   While  they were shivering  barefooted  and  half
naked  in  their huts at this place, the  British  soldiers  were
snugly quartered and well fed and their officers feted and feast-
ed by the tories in Philadelphia.
    In  the  spring of 1778 an attempt was made  by  the  English
government  through  commissioners to  effect  a  reconciliation.
Whether  or  not an honorable reconciliation was desired  may  be
judged  by  the fact that they offered Joseph Reed,  one  of  the
delegates  in Congress from Pennsylvania,  f10,000 and  the  best
office in the colonies to aid them in their purposes.  His  reply
should  be remembered:-"I am not worth purchasing, but such as  I
am the King of Great Britain is not rich enough to do it."
    It  was  in  the spring of 1778 that French  entered  into  a
treaty  with  the Americans, and sent four  frigates  and  twelve
ships to the Delaware.  In consequence of this Sir Henry Clinton,
who  had  succeeded  Lord Howe in command of  the  British,  army
decided  to  evacuate Philadelphia, which he  did,  marching  his
forces  across  New York.  Washington pursued,  and  engaged  the
enemy  at Monmouth and compelled them to give way.   Philadelphia
again  became the capital in the latter part of June, 1778.  Some
trials were had for high treason, and several of those  convicted
were  executed, greatly to the alarm of the tories  and  Quakers.
They had been emboldened by the temporary success of the  British
arms,  and these examples seemed necessary to inspire  them  with
terror and prevent future treasonable acts, as well as to appease
the vengeance of the whigs who had suffered at their hands.
    By the evacuation of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ceased to  be
the theater of important warlike events.  The English  government
had, however, induced the Indians of the Iroquois nations in  New
York and those of the territory west from Pennsylvania to  engage
in hostilities against the people of the struggling States.  This
warfare  was waged in accordance with their "known rule."  Incur-
sions were made, defenseless settlements attacked, and people  of
every  age,  sex  and condition" were  ruthlessly  murdered.  The
settlements in many regions were left unprotected, because nearly
all the men capable of bearing arms had responded to their  coun-
try's  call  and  joined  the Revolutionary army.   In  1777  the
northern  frontier  on New York was the scene of  many  of  these
savage irruption's, and the frontier settlements of these  States
were  scarcely  troubled by marauding  parties.   They  doubtless
enjoyed  this immunity because of the proximity of troops,  which
could be quickly sent to protect these settlements.  In 1778  the
storm of Indian warfare burst on them.  A descent was made on the
Wyoming  valley by a force of British, tories and  Indians,  com-
manded  by  Colonel John Butler.  Many of  the  inhabitants  were
cruelly  massacred and the valley was devastated.  A descent  was
also made on the branch of the Susquehanna by a force of Indians,
tories  and British, under Colonel MacDonald.  The frontier  set-
tlements  in  Westminster county also were  ravaged  by  scalping
parties.  A force under General McIntosh was sent to protect  the
western frontier, which was done by the erection of forts and  by
expeditions  into  the country of the  hostile  savages.
     The  Indian villages at Wyalusing, Shesequin and Tioga  were
destroyed  by a small force under Colonel Hartley.  In  order  to
punish  the  most  audacious of these savages,  and  prevent,  if
possible, future depredations by them, General Sullivan was  sent
with a sufficient force in the summer of 1779 up the  Susquehanna
into the Genesee valley, the heart of the country of the Senecas-
the most powerful and warlike nation of the Iroquois-with  orders
"to  cut off their settlements, destroy their crops, and  inflict
on  them every other mischief that time and  circumstances  would
permit".  This  work was thoroughly accomplished.  A  battle  was
fought  on the Chemung river at Newtown (Elmira),  in  which  the
Indians, under the celebrated Mohawk chief Brant, and the tories,
under Colonel John Butler, were routed. The valley of the Genesee
was devastated, forty towns were burned, orchards were cut  down,
corn  fields  were ravaged, and one hundred  and  sixty  thousand
bushels  of corn destroyed.  From this blow the  warlike  Senecas
never recovered.  Though marauding parties continued to go forth,
they were not afterward able to send out any large force.
    Colonel Brodhead, at about the same time, went on an  expedi-
tion against the Indians on the west branch of the Allegheny  and
destroyed  the crops and villages there, and cut off a  party  of
forty  who had started on an expedition to the frontier of  West-
moreland county.

              ____________end page 18._______________

                                                          page 19

     LATER REVOLUTIONARY EVENTS-TRANSACTIONS WITH THE INDIANS
 ________________________________________________________________

                          CHAPTER VI.
                       ________________

                  LATER EVENTS OF THE REVOLUTION
                   WAR WITH THE WESTERN INDIANS
                      CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES
                        _________________

    During  the year 1780 much difficulty was experienced on  ac-
count  of the depreciation of the paper currency, which the  exi-
gencies of the war had made it necessary to issue.  Efforts  were
made  by the Assembly to relieve the State from  this  embarrass-
ment,  with only partial success.  In 1781, in accordance with  a
plan of Robert Morris, who justly earned the title of "the finan-
cier of the Revolution," the Bank of North America was  chartered
by Congress, and charters were also granted to it by Pennsylvania
and Massachusetts.  The effect of this was immediately beneficial
to  the commercial and financial interests of the  country.   The
Pennsylvania charter was revoked by the Legislature in 1785,  but
was restored in 1787.
    During  1780 the Legislature enacted a law  reorganizing  the
militia  system of the State, in order that any sudden  emergency
might  be promptly met.  In view of the exigencies of  the  times
authority  was  vested in the executive to  declare  martial  law
during the recess of the Assembly, so far as should be  necessary
under  circumstances  that might arise.  It was  resolved,  also,
that in extraordinary efforts that were found necessary to obtain
supplies, discrimination might be made between the friends of the
country  and those who had shown themselves to be  otherwise.  To
guard against spies, authority was given to arrest all suspicious
persons and  prevent the admission of strangers indiscriminately.
The  horses and other property of domestic enemies  were  seized,
and the houses of Quakers were searched for arms.
    The  entrance into New Jersey of the British army  under  Sir
Henry Clinton was the cause of great alarm, but this army did not
advance  on  Philadelphia.  Soon afterward four thousand  of  the
militia  were ordered out to assist in a projected attack on  New
York,  but by reason of the non-arrival of the French troops  the
project  was  abandoned,  and the militia force,  which  had  its
rendezvous at Trenton, was disbanded.
    The  treason  of Benedict Arnold occurred in  the  autumn  of
1780.  Awhile in command at Philadelphia in 1778  General  Arnold
became  allied  by marriage with a distinguished tory  family  in
that city, and the intimacy with British officers into which this
relation  threw him, together with the sting which his  sensitive
nature  received by being court-martialed for some  irregularity,
may  have led him to his fatal error.  Soon after the receipt  of
the  news of his treason in Philadelphia, his effigy was  paraded
through the streets and hanged, his wife was ordered to leave the
city within fourteen days, and his estate was confiscated.  Still
more rigorous proceedings were instituted against the tories  and
Quakers, one of whom was convicted of high treason and hanged.
    In  January, 1781, a revolt occurred among  the  Pennsylvania
troops, who were in winter quarters at Morristown, under  command
of General Wayne.  About thirteen hundred of the disaffected left
the camp and established their quarters at Princeton.  The causes
of this mutiny were depreciation of the currency in which the men
were paid, arrearages of pay and suffering for want of money  and
clothing,  and  the retention in the service of some  beyond  the
terms  of  their enlistment.  There was  nothing  treasonable  in
their  revolt. On the contrary, two emissaries who were  sent  to
them  with large offers from the commander of the British  forces
were seized, delivered to General Wayne, tried as spies, convict-
ed and executed. An investigation was instituted by General Wayne
and  President  Reed, their grievances were redressed,  and  they
returned to their duty.
    In  the spring of 1781 the Pennsylvania troops under  General
Wayne  joined  the force of La Fayette, and marched to  join  the
force of General Greene.  Fearing an attack upon Philadelphia  by
the troops from New York, Congress recommended the calling out of
three thousand militia.  They were ordered to rendezvous at  New-
town, in Bucks county, where they remained till the departure  of
the  British  troops from New York for the relief  of  Cornwallis
allayed  all fear for the safety of Philadelphia, when they  were
disbanded.
    In October, 1781, the army of Cornwallis surrendered at York-
town,  thus virtually ending the war of the  Revolution.  Pending
the  negotiation of a treaty of peace, which was signed  November
30th,  1781, the Assembly of Pennsylvania unanimously  adopted  a
resolution  disapproving of a reunion with Great Britain  on  any
terms;  against the conclusion of a treaty of peace with  England
without the concurrence of France, and against the revival of the
proprietary family privileges.  Such had been the bitter  experi-
ence of the people of Pennsylvania under the propriety government
and  the British yoke that they were determined to guard  against
everything that could lead to a recurrence of that experience.
    Although  the chartered boundaries of Pennsylvania were  set-
tled before the termination of the Revolutionary war, the  Indian
title  to  all  the territory within those limits  had  not  been
extinguished.   Purchases from the Indians had been made in  1736
and  previously,  in 1749, in 1758 and 1768.  These  amounted  to
about two-thirds of the chartered territory.  The balance,  lying
in  the northwest part of the State, was purchased from the  Iro-
quois  at the treaty of Fort Stanwix  in October, 1784,  and  the
purchase  was  confirmed by the Delawares and  Wyandots  at  Fort
McIntosh  in  January, 1785. Notwithstanding  this  purchase  the
Delaware  and  Wyandots kept up a barbarous warfare  against  the
settlers,  and in addition to the expeditions that had been  sent
against  them, among which was that of the ill fated Crawford  in
1782,  Charmer  in  1791 and Wayne from 1792  to  1795  conducted
campaigns  against them.  The last in August, 1795,  concluded  a
treaty  with  them which terminated hostilities.  "Besides  these
expeditions,"  says  Sherman Day, "there was an  undercurrent  of
partisan   hostilities

              _____________end page 19._______________

                                                          page 20

                 OUTLINE HISTORY OF PENNSYLVANIA
 ________________________________________________________________

constantly  maintained between the white savages on the  frontier
and  the red, in which it was difficult to say on which side  was
exhibited  the  greatest atrocity."    It has been  said  that  a
State constitution was adopted in 1776 to supersede the  proprie-
tary  government.  Under this constitution  an  assembly  elected
annually  was  the  legislative department; a council  of  twelve
persons  was chosen for three years and by joint  ballot  of  the
assembly  and council a president was elected, which  constituted
the executive department. It also provided for the choice septen-
nially of a council of censors to revise the doings of the Legis-
lature  and  executive, pass censures,  recommend  repeals,  etc.
This  constitution  was defective, though an improvement  on  the
proprietary government.
    In  December, 1779, the royal charter was annulled by an  act
of Assembly, and the proprietaries were granted f130,000 sterling
to  compensate  them for their lost  privileges,  they  retaining
their  real  estate and rents.  In 1780 the act for  the  gradual
extinction  of slavery was passed.  In recommending  this  action
the  executive council said: "Honored will that State be  in  the
annals of mankind which shall first abolish this violation of the
rights  of mankind."    

    In 1787 the convention which  framed the constitution  of the
United States sat in Philadelphia.  It concluded its labor on the
18th of September, and on the 12th of  the following  December  a
convention  called for  the purpose  by the Assembly ratified it,
thus placing Pennsylvania first on the list of Estates which ado-
pted it.  After the adoption of the federal constitution the def-
ects of the State constitution of 1776 were more than ever before
apparent. Chief Justice McKean had said of it: "The balance of the
one, the few  and the  many is not  well poised in the State; the
Legislature is too powerful for the executive and judicial branc-
hes.  We have now but one branch; we must have another  branch, a
negative in the executive,  stability in  our laws and permanency
in the magistracy  before we shall be reputable, safe and happy."
    In  accordance with a resolution of the  Assembly,  delegates
were  chosen at the October election in 1789 to frame a new  con-
stitution.   They  assembled in November of the  same  year,  and
after a long session completed their labors, and the constitution
which they formed was adopted in September, 1790.
    In  this  the general plan of the  Federal  constitution  was
followed.  The  executive department was vested  in  a  governor,
elected by the people; the legislative in a Senate and  Assembly,
while  the judicial system was not greatly changed,  except  that
the  tenure  of  office of the judges of the  higher  courts  was
during  good  behavior  instead of seven years,  as  before.  The
supreme  executive  council and the council of  censors  were  of
course  abolished.
    In  1837 the constitution was revised by a convention  assem-
bled  for  that purpose, and the changes which  were  recommended
were adopted the next year.  Among these were alterations in  the
tenure  of offices, an abridgment of the powers of  the  Legisla-
ture,  the taking away of nearly all executive patronage  and  an
extension of the elective franchise.
    Another revision of the constitution was made by a convention
for that purpose in 1873, and the amended constitution was adopt-
ed the same year.  This constitution abolished especial  legisla-
tion, changed the time of annual elections, altered the tenure of
the judiciary, modified the pardoning power, provided for minori-
ty representation, for biennial sessions of the Legislature,  for
an  increase in the number of both branches of  the  Legislature,
and made other important changes.
    In 1794 an attempt was made to lay out a town where the  city
of Erie-then called Presque Isle, from the peninsula which  shel-
ters  the  excellent harbor at that point-now stands.  The  small
triangle  necessary to secure this harbor was purchased from  the
Indians  in 1789, and from the United States in 1792.  Resistance
to  this  settlement by the Seneca Indians  was  apprehended,  by
reason  of a misunderstanding on the part of the latter, and  the
matter was postponed to the next year, by which time matters were
arranged  with them.  The western tribes were at that  time  hos-
tile.

                            ________________

                               CHAPTER VII.
                              _____________

                 THE PENNAMITE WAR--WHISKEY INSURRECTION
               "MOLLY MAGUIRE" OUTRAGES--THE RIOTS OF 1877

    What has always been known as the Pennamite war, arose out of
the  conflicting claims of the colonies of Connecticut and  Penn-
sylvania  to the territory included between the  forty-first  and
forty-second parallels of latitude-now in this State.
    In  1662 King Charles the Second confirmed to the  colony  of
Connecticut  the title which it had previously, acquired to  this
territory; and in 1681 the same monarch granted a portion of  the
same territory to William Penn. In 1762 settlers from New England
took  possession of lands in the Wyoming valley, and during  that
and the succeeding year  made some improvements there; but in the
autumn of 1763 they were driven away by the Indians.
   They returned in 1769, but about the same time parties  claim-
ing  titles  under the Pennsylvania grant took  possession  of  a
portion  of the same territory.  An attempt was made by the  Con-
necticut  settlers to forcibly eject these, and thus was  inaugu-
rated  a  contest and a series of conflicts, which,  though  they
were  suspended during the Revolutionary war, were renewed  after
ward, and were not finally settled till about the year 1800.
    What has usually been termed the whiskey insurrection assumed
somewhat  formidable proportions in 1794.  In 1684,  1738,  1744,
1772 and 1780 duties had been

                ____________end page 20.________________

                                                          page 21

  WHISKEY INSURRECTION--MOLLY MAGUIRES--THE GREAT STRIKE OF 1877.
 ________________________________________________________________

imposed on domestic spirits by the Assembly of the province,  but
after  a time the acts imposing these duties were  repealed.   In
1791, by act of Congress, an excise of four pence per gallon  was
laid  on all distilled spirits.  This tax weighed heavily on  the
people  of western Pennsylvania, where in some districts a  sixth
of  fifth  of  the farmers were distillers, and  nearly  all  the
coarse  grain was converted into spirit and this sent across  the
mountains  or down the Ohio river to market.  A majority  of  the
inhabitants  of this region were Scotch-Irish of  their  descend-
ants, and their recollections or traditions of resistance to  the
excise laws in the "old country" inclined them to follow here the
examples of their fathers.  In the year of the passage of the act
resistance to its enforcement  commenced, and meetings were held,
at which resolutions were passed denouncing all who should attem-
pt the enforcement of the law, and  excise  officers were  tarred
and feathered and otherwise maltreated. This resistance continued
during the succeeding two or three years. People who were suspec-
ted of  favoring the law were proscribed, socially and otherwise,
and open resistance to its execution, by violence to the  persons
and injury to the property of those attempting to execute it, was
practiced.  This was  the condition of things in the  counties of
Allegheny, Fayette, Washington and Westmoreland. In 1794 Congress
amended the law, but nothing short of absolute repeal would  sat-
isfy  the malcontents, whose successful  resistance  had greatly 
emboldened them. Armed and organized mobs assembled, attacked the
houses of excise officers and burned their buildings, and several
persons were killed in these riots.  Finally a large force assem-
bled and marched on Pittsburg, determined to burn the house of an
excise officer there; but by adroit management they were prevent-
ed from doing any harm beyond burning a barn.  These lawless pro-
ceedings were reported to  the authorities, and the  President of
the United States and the governor of the State issued  proclama-
tions  commanding the  insurgents to  disperse, and  calling  for
troops to suppress the insurrection.  In obedience to this procl-
amation a force of about 13,000 was raised in Virginia, Maryland,
New York, and  Pennsylvania, and  under the  command  of Governor
Henry Lee, of Virginia, marched to the  insurrectionary district.
This  awed the  insurgents into obedience  and no further trouble
was experienced.
    In 1798 the Fries insurrection, or "hot water war," as it was
called  because of the method adopted by the women  in  resisting
the collection of the "house tax, "occurred in Bucks and Montgom-
ery counties.  Troops were called out; Fries and  others-leaders-
were arrested, tried, and convicted of treason, but  subsequently
pardoned.
    The Erie Railroad war, which occurred in the winter of  1853-
4, is still fresh in the recollection of many. This arose out  of
the opposition of the people of Erie to the action of what is now
the  Lake  Shore Railroad Company in laying a  track  of  uniform
width  through the city. The track was torn up and  bridges  were
destroyed by a mob encouraged by the city authorities, and travel
was  embarrassed  during several months.  Order was  finally  re-
stored,  and  Erie  has since been widely known  as  the  "peanut
city."
    About the year 1862 a reign of terror was inaugurated in some
portions  of the mining regions in the State of Pennsylvania,  by
the discovery that there existed among the miners an organization
of  desperadoes who set the law at defiance, and aided  and  pro-
tected  each other in the blackest crimes known.  This  organiza-
tion is popularly known as the Mollie Maguires, and it was trans-
planted in this country about the year 1854 from Ireland.  It was
an organization for resistance to the landlords in that  country,
and took its name from a desperate woman, who was very active and
efficient  in shooting landlords' agents.  In this country it  is
said  that it never existed as a distinct organization, but  that
the secret acts of lawlessness and crimes that had  characterized
the Mollie Maguires came to be tolerated and even sanctioned  and
abetted by the "Ancient Order of Hibernians," a benevolent insti-
tution  which  had long existed and which, in  some  States,  was
incorporated.  When  they  first attracted  attention  they  were
termed  "Buckshots,"  and, although troublesome,  they  were  not
considered very dangerous.  Their crimes came to be more frequent
and  audacious.  They resisted the enrollment for  the  draft  in
1862.  Arson, and the assassination of those who  incurred  their
displeasure, came to be more and more common, and were perpetrat-
ed  with  entire impunity, for an alibi was  always  proved;  and
during  the  twelve  or thirteen years following  the  influx  of
foreign miners into the coal regions, which began soon after  the
breaking  out of the Rebellion, they came to be a real terror  in
those regions.  At length a skillful detective succeeded in gain-
ing  admission  to their order and obtaining a knowledge  of  its
secret  workings,  and of the perpetrators of  the  many  murders
which  had  been committed.  The results was that many  of  these
murders  were  brought  to justice, and the  order  was  rendered
impotent by the exposure of its dangerous character.
    In  the summer of 1877 what is known as the great strike  oc-
curred.  This commenced in the city of Baltimore, among  the  em-
ployees  of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, and  rapidly
extended  the entire length of the road.  Three days later,  July
19th, certain employees of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company also
struck,  or refused to work.  The immediate cause or pretext  for
the  strike at Pittsburg was an order from the superintendent  of
the  road  extending the trip of a "crew:" thus-as it  was  said-
rendering  a  smaller  number of men necessary  and  depriving  a
portion of their employment.
    The  exigencies  of was of 1861-65  brought  about  unhealthy
condition  of  things throughout the country.  The  currency  was
inflated;  business acquired an abnormal activity; the prices  of
produce,  of  manufactured articles, and of  labor  were  greatly
enhanced,  and  a general expansion took place.  This  engendered
among  all  classes  a degree of  reckless  extravagance  unknown
before, and when, after the lapse of a few years, business gradu-
ally

          __________________end page 21.___________________

                                                          page 22
                    OUTLINE HISTORY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  _______________________________________________________________

came  to be established on a more healthy basis, people found  it
difficult  to adapt themselves to their changed surroundings,  to
practice the more rigid economy which those surroundings necessi-
tated,  and to appreciate the increased and  steadily  increasing
value of a dollar.  When, therefore, by reason of a  depreciation
in  the  prices of produce, a lessened  demand  for  manufactured
goods,  and a consequent which the profits of  manufacturers,  it
became  necessary  to  reduce the price of  labor,  many  labors,
finding it hard to submit to these inevitable changes, and  fail-
ing to appreciate the necessity for them, sought by the  exercise
of  lawless force to compel producers, manufactures, or  carriers
to continue the prices which they paid in more prosperous  times.
    Such  was  the  condition of things at  the  commencement  of
thisstrike.  At first certain railroads employees, who considered
themselves aggrieved, refused to work, and sought by intimidation
and  force to prevent others from doing the work which  they  re-
fused to do.  At Pittsburg these were joined by the idle, vicious
and reckless who were not in the employ of the railroad  company,
and  at  once became more and more disorderly  and  defiant.  The
authorities were called on to protect the company's property, but
the  force  failed to control the mob.  The militia  were  called
out,  and some of the soldiers fraternized with the rioters,  and
others  proved  inefficient by reason of a mistaken  aversion  to
firing on them, and finally allowed themselves to be driven  from
their position.  The citizens took no measures to repress  disor-
der, but rather looked on approvingly.
   Under  such circumstances the crowd constantly augmented,  and
became more and more desperate.  Incendiarism and pillage came to
be the order of things, and property to the amount of millions of
dollars  was destroyed.  Proclamations were issued by the  gover-
nor, more militia were called out, and at last the citizens awoke
from their apathy when they became aware that the city itself was
in danger of destruction, and the riotous proceedings were final-
ly quelled.
    Meantime the strike had extended until it had become  general
along  the Pennsylvania Railroad.  Violence was resorted  to  and
property destroyed at various places along the line of the  road,
but nowhere was there such a reign of terror as at Pittsburg.  At
Philadelphia the authorities took such ample precautions, and the
police acted so promptly and efficiently when the riot broke  out
there, that it was at once put down.  The governor visited  riot-
ous localities along the line of the road in person,  accompanied
by  troops, and regular soldiers were furnished by order  of  the
President  and Secretary of War, on application of Governor  Har-
tranft, to aid in restoring order.
    At Reading riots broke out on the 22nd of July.  The  militia
were  called  out, but proved inefficient, though  one  regiment,
without orders, poured a volley into the assailing crowd, killing
ten  and wounding forty and scattering the rioters for the  time.
The  presence  of  300 regular troops finally awed  the  mob  and
restored order.
    By  the 24th the strike had extended to the  mining  regions,
and was extensively participated in by the miners. Riots occurred
at Pottsville, Shamokin, Bethlehem, Easton, Wilkes-Barre,  Scran-
ton  and elsewhere.  Work in the mines was arrested,  some  mines
were flooded, railroad property was destroyed and many lives were
sacrificed  in  the  riots and the efforts to  quell  them.   The
greatest  destruction  of property, however,  was  at  Pittsburg,
where the citizens have since been punished for the tacit encour-
agement which they at first gave the rioters, by being  compelled
to pay for the property destroyed.

                           ____________

                           CHAPTER VIII.
                        __________________

                    HARRISBURG MADE THE CAPITAL
                          THE WAR OF 1812
                  INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS-SCHOOLS
                   __________________________

    The  project of removing the capital of the State to  a  more
central  location began to be agitated during the last decade  of
the eighteenth century.  In 1795, 1796 and 1798 efforts were made
to  accomplish  such  removal, but they failed for  the  want  of
concurrent  action in the two branches of the  Legislature.  Car-
lisle,  Reading,  Lancaster, Wright's Ferry and  Harrisburg  were
unsuccessfully proposed.  In 1799 Lancaster was selected, and the
Legislature  met  there for the first time in  December  of  that
year.   By an act of the Legislature in 1810 it was in  1812  re-
moved  from  Lancaster  to Harrisburg; and the  sessions  of  the
Legislature  were held in the court-house at that place till  the
completion of the public building in 1821.
    The  war  of 1812 had its origin in aggressions  against  the
United States by Great Britain, which were continued during  many
years,  notwithstanding the earnest protests of this nation.  The
rights  of the United States as neutrals were disregarded  during
the  Napoleonic wars, and among other encroachments  the  English
government  claimed the right to board and search  American  ves-
sels,  and authorized its officers to examine their crews,  seize
all  those  whom they chose to regard as  British  subjects,  and
force them into service.  All remonstrances were unavailing.  The
English  in enforcing this right of search committed  great  out-
rages,  and  the practice became so obnoxious as to  demand  some
decided measures for its suppression.  Under these  circumstances
there  appeared no alternative but war; and Congress  having  au-
thorized  it, war against Great Britain was declared on the  19th
of  June, 1812.  The measure was not universally  sustained.  The
Federal party, then in the minority, opposed it; and their polit-
ical  opinions being apparently stronger than  their  patriotism,
they  loudly denounced it.  The Federalists in New York  and  New
England were most prominent in their opposition, and if they  did
not directly aid the enemy their conduct was discouraging

           ______________end page 22.________________

                                                          page 23

               WAR OF 1812-INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS
  _______________________________________________________________

and  injurious  to those who were periling their lives  in  their
country's cause.  This opposition was, however, quite impotent in
Pennsylvania.
    At  the  commencement  of the war Governor  Snyder  issued  a
patriotic call for fourteen thousand volunteers; and such was the
alacrity  of  the response that three times the  number  required
tendered  their services, and money was readily offered  for  the
places of those who were accepted.
    During  this  war Pennsylvania was not the scene  of  hostile
operations,  although  her frontier was threatened.  A  force  of
British  and  Indians appeared on the north shore  of  the  lake,
opposite  to  Erie, in July, 1812; but the prompt  measures  that
were taken for the defense of the port prevented an attack.   The
mouth  of  the Delaware was blockaded in 1813, and  most  of  the
foreign  commerce of Philadelphia was cut off; but the river  had
been  placed in such a state of defense that it was  not invaded.
A thousand men were sent to protect the shores of this river, and
an equal force sent to guard the harbor of Erie, where vessels of
war were in process of construction and  equipment. The brilliant
victory of  Commodore  Perry  on the 10th of September, 1813, was
the result of the fitting out of this naval force.
    The ravaging  of the shores of Chesapeake bay, and the burn-
ing of Washington, in 1813 and 1814, and the threatening attitude
if the  enemy after these depredation, induced Governor Snyder to
issue  another  call for troops to defend the State  against  the
peril  which menaced it. In compliance with this a force of  five
thousand  established a rendezvous on the Delaware, and  although
the  soil  of Pennsylvania was not invaded this  force  did  good
service  in marching to the relief of Baltimore when it  was  at-
tacked, and aiding to repel the enemy.  It is worthy of note,  as
showing  the difference in the patriotism of men  from  different
sections of the country, that four thousand New York troops under
General  Van Rennsselaer refused to cross the line  into  Canada,
but that, soon afterward, a brigade of Pennsylvanians, consisting
of  two  thousand, under General Tannehill, crossed  without  the
slightest  hesitation, glad to be able to meet the enemy  on  his
own  soil  and do battle for their country.  A  treaty  of  peace
between  the  two nations was ratified on the 17th  of  February,
1815.
    The extensive system of internal improvements which has swal-
lowed  so many  millions  of money  in this  State was  commenced
about  the  year 1790.  The first efforts were  directed  to  the
improvement  of  navigation in the rivers of the State;  then  as
time  went on, construction of a system of canals  and  turnpikes
was entered on, and prosecuted beyond that of any other State  in
the Union.  The grand project of securing the trade of the  West,
through  a connection between Philadelphia and the waters of  the
Ohio  at  Pittsburg, by a line of public works, was  realized  in
1831.  In  order to secure the influence and votes  necessary  to
authorize  this  it had been found necessary to  construct  other
canals  in various parts of the State, the inhabitants  of  which
desired to participate in the benefits of the system of  internal
improvements,  and thus that system in this State came to  exceed
in magnitude that of any other.
    It  was  not possible, however, for the wisest of  those  who
projected and promoted this system of improvements to foresee the
rise and rapid progress of another system, which was to take  the
place  of  and wholly  supersede that which, at such an  enormous
expense, they inaugurated and carried forward.
    In 1827 a railroad, nine miles in length, the longest then in
existence  in America, was constructed from Mauch Chunk  to  some
coal mines.  Only two had preceded this-one, with a wooden track,
at a stone quarry in the country of Delaware, Penn., and another,
having  a  length of three miles, at a quarry  in  Quincy,  Mass.
Since that time the railroad system of this country has developed
to its present magnitude.  A majority of the canals are dry, many
have  been converted into railroad beds, and even the rivers  and
lakes  of the country have dwindled into  comparative  insignifi-
cance as avenues of travel or transportation.  In 1857 the  prin-
cipal line of public works between Pittsburg and Philadelphia was
sold  to the Pennsylvania Railroad Company for a fraction of  its
cost,  and measures were at once taken for the sale of the  other
works belonging to the State thus do systems, one after  another,
develop and pass away, and no prevision can point out what is  to
come.
    While it is  true that in some of the States of the Union the
present system  of internal improvements, which has been fostered
and encouraged  by those States, has proved to be almost the ruin
of  their  best interests, the reverse is true  in  Pennsylvania.
The  development of the immense mineral resources of  the  Estate
required the construction of these avenues of transportation, and
the cost of those built by the State, though they were  afterward
sold for only a part of that cost, was returned many fold in  the
increase of wealth which was the direct result of their construc-
tion.  When the first canal was projected the use  of  anthracite
coal  was  hardly known, and the cost of  its  transportation  to
market  was so great as to preclude the possibility of its  prof-
itable use.  With every increase in the facilities for the trans-
portation of this important mineral it has been cheapened to  the
consumer,  and its production has been rendered more  profitable;
and now large areas which have no value for any other purpose are
sources of immense and constantly increasing wealth.
    Previous to the year 1834 many acts were passed by the Legis-
lature pertaining in some way to the subject of  education.  Some
of  these were local in their application, and some  were  little
more  than  resolutions in favor of education.  Isolated  schools
were established in  various localities, in most of which  provi-
sion  was made for the education of their children of  the  poor.
The  people of the different religious denominations made  provi-
sion  for  the education of their  children,  often  establishing
parochial  schools.  This  was the case  with  the  Quakers,  the
Scotch-Irish Presbyterians, the German Lutherans, the Mennonists,
the Moravians, the Dunkards, etc. Nothing having the semblance of
a  public school system was established previous to the  adoption
of the constitution

              ____________end page 23.______________

                                                        page 24

                  OUTLINE HISTORY OF PENNSYLVANIA
 _______________________________________________________________

of 1790, which required that provision should be made by law  for
the general establishment of schools wherein gratuitous  instruc-
tion should be given to the children of the poor. From that  time
till  1827  efforts were from time to time made  to  establish  a
system in accordance with this requirement, but with only partial
success, the radical defect in all being the distinction  between
the children of the rich and poor.  In 1827 earnest and systemat-
ic  efforts began to be put forth for the establishment  of  free
schools for all, and in 1834 the foundation of the present common
school system was laid, in the enactment of a law for the mainte-
nance  of  schools by a tax on all taxable  property.  This  law,
which  was at first imperfect, was revised and amended  in  1836,
1849,  1854  and 1857, in which last year the present  system  of
normal schools was established.
    In  1863  the Pennsylvania Railroad Company  donated  to  the
State  $50,000 for the education of soldiers' orphans.   In  1865
the  Legislature  added  to this  an  appropriation  of  $75,000.
Schools and homes were established for these wards of the  State,
and during several years an annual expenditure was made for  this
purpose of half a million of dollars.  At these homes and  school
soldiers'  orphans  were boarded, clothed,  educated  and  taught
habits of industry, and at a proper age were placed in situations
to acquire trades or professions.
    In 1749 an academy was established by subscription in  Phila-
delphia  "for instruction in the Latin and English languages  and
mathematics." This was the foundation of the University of  Penn-
sylvania.  This  and Dickinson College, at  Carlisle,  which  was
founded in 1783, were the only colleges in the State previous  to
the  commencement  of  the  nineteenth  century.  There  are  now
twenty-seven, of which five are purely secular or  non-sectarian.
There  are also seventeen theological institutions,  ten  medical
schools and one law school.

                             ____________

                              CHAPTER IX.
                             ____________

             PATRIOTIC ACTION IN THE MEXICAN AND CIVIL WARS
                     GOVERNORS OF PENNSYLVANIA.
                              __________

    In  1846 war was declared by this government against  Mexico,
and by virtue of authority vested in him by Congress, the  Presi-
dent calld on Pennsylvania for six volunteer regiments of  infan-
try, to hold themselves in readiness for service during one year,
or  to the end of the war. Such was the alacrity with  which  the
citizens responded to this call, that within thirty days a suffi-
cient number of volunteers had offered their services to  consti-
tute nine full regiments.  Of these, between two and three  regi-
ments were sent into the country of the enemy, and their  conduct
at Vera Cruz, Cerro Gordo, Chepultepec and the city of Mexico was
highly  creditable  to themselves as well as to the  State  which
they represented.
    The promptitude with which Pennsylvania responded to call  of
the federal government in 1812 and 1846 was fully equaled by  the
readiness  with which her citizens flew to arms at  the  breaking
out  of  the great Southern rebellion.  In anticipation  of  that
event  the citizens of Pittsburg had refused to allow arms to  be
taken from their arsenal and sent south by traitorous  government
officials; and, when the storm of war burst upon the country, the
patriotism  of the citizens of this State was aroused to  such  a
pitch  that, in response to the call for Pennsylvania's quota  of
the  75,000  first  called for, fourteen  regiments,  enough  for
twenty-five, offered themselves.
    A  place of rendezvous, called, in honor of the  governor  of
the State, Camp Curtin, was established at Harrisburg, and on the
morning  of April 18th, 1861, six days after the attack  on  Fort
Sumter  and three days after the proclamation calling for  75,000
men  was issued five companies of volunteers left Harrisburg  for
Washington.  They  passed through Baltimore amid  the  jeers  and
imprecations  of the mob, that followed them and  hurled  bricks,
clubs  and other missiles at them as they boarded the  cars,  and
arrived at Washington on the evening of the same day.  They  were
the first troops that reached the national capital, and for  this
prompt  response  to  the call of their country,  and  for  their
coolness and courage in passing through the mob, they were after-
ward  thanked, in a resolution, by the House of  Representatives.
Within  twelve  days,  or before the first  of  May,  twenty-five
regiments, amounting to more than twenty thousand men, were  sent
from  this State to the field.  The expense of clothing,  subsis-
ing,  arming,  equipping and transporting these troops  was  sus-
tained by the State.
    By  the advance of General Lee toward the southern border  of
the  state in September, 1862, an invasion of its  territory  was
evidently  threatened,  and Governor  Curtain,  by  proclamation,
called  for fifty thousand men to meet the emergency.  These  not
only marched to the border, which they covered, but most of  them
crossed into the State of Maryland, and by their presence assist-
ed in preventing the advance northward of the rebel army.
    Another emergency arose in June, 1863, to meet which Governor
Curtin issued a proclamation calling out the entire militia of the
state.  By reason of a lack of concert in the action of the State
and  National  authorities,  only a portion  of  this  force  was
brought  into  service previous to the battle of  Gettysburg.  Of
that battle the limits of this sketch will not permit a  detailed
account.   It  was  the result of the second  attempt  to  invade
northern territory and it was a disaster to the rebels from which
they  never  recovered.
    The  territory of the State was again invaded in July,  1864,
and  all the available troops in the State were sent  forward  to
repel  the invasion.  The inhabitants along the  southern  border
were  considerably annoyed and injured by this invasion, and  the
town  of  Chambersburg burned.  More than two hundred  and  fifty
houses were

                __________end page 24.____________

                                                         page 25

                       WAR OF THE REBELLION
                    GOVERNORS OF PENNSYLVANIA
  ____________________________________________________________

fired by the rebels and the town was entirely destroyed involving
a loss of about $2,000,000.  It was an act of wanton vandalism.
    Of Camp Curtin, there was established at the commencement  of
the  war, it may be said that it was not only a place of  rendez-
vous for soldiers and of deposit for military stores, but a depot
for  prisoners  and a hospital for the sick and for  the  wounded
after  some of the great battles, especially the battles of  Get-
tysburg  and Antietam.  It was early placed under the control  of
the  federal government, and so continued till the close  of  the
war.
    A  brief mention should be made of the part which  the  loyal
women of the State bore in this conflict.  Not only did they part
with  their  husbands, sons and brothers, who went  forth  to  do
battle  for their country and the preservations of  its  institu-
tions,  and in many cases to lay down their lives, but  they  put
forth  their  efforts to provide and send forward  to  those  who
languished in distant hospitals those comforts which the  govern-
ment  could not furnish; and many a sick or wounded  soldier  had
occasion  to bless his unknown benefactress for some delicacy  or
comfort of which he was the recipient.
    During the continuance of this war the State of  Pennsylvania
furnished for the army two hundred and seventy regiments and many
detached companies, amounting in all to 387,284 men.  The follow-
ing  quotation from a special message of Governor Curtin, at  the
close  of the war, is a well deserved tribute to the  self-sacri-
ficing patriotism of the people of this State: 
   "Proceeding in the strict line of duty, the resources of Penn-
sylvania,  whether in men or money, have neither been withheld or
squandered. The history of the conduct of our people in the field
is illuminated with  incidents of  heroism  worthy of conspicuous
notice; but it would be  impossible to mention them in the proper
limits of this message, without doing injustice or perhaps making
invidious distinctions. It would be alike impossible to furnish a
history of the associated benevolence, and of the large individual
contributions to the comfort of our people in the field and  hos-
pital; or of the names and services at all times of our volunteer
surgeons, when called to assist in the hospital or on the  battle
field.   Nor is it possible to do justice to the  many  patriotic
and  Christian  men who were always ready when  summoned  to  the
exercise  of acts of humanity and benevolence.  Our  armies  were
sustained and strengthened in the field by the patriotic devotion
of their friends at home; and we can never render full justice to
the  heaven-directed,  patriotic, Christian  benevolence  of  the
women of the State."
    The following is a list of the governors of the colony, prov-
ince and State of Pennsylvania, with the years of the appointment
or election of each:
    Under the Swedes: 1638, Peter Minuit; 1641, Peter Hollandare;
1643,  John  Printz; 1653, John Pappegoya; 1654,  Johan  Claudius
Rysingh.
    Under the Dutch:  1655, Peter Stuyvesant (Deryck Schmidt  pro
tem.); 1655, John Paul Jaquet; 1657, Jacob Alrichs; 1659, Alexan-
der  D. Hinyossa; 1652, William Beekman; 1663, Alexander  D.  Hi-
nyossa;  1673, Anthony Colve (Peter Alrich's  deputy).
    Under  the  Duke  of York:   1664,  Colonel  Richard  Nichols
(Robert Carr, deputy); 1667, Colonel Francis Lovelace.
    Under the English:  1674, Sir Edmund Andross:
    Under the proprietary government: 1681, William Markham, depu-
ty;  1682,  William Penn; 1684, Thomas Lloyd,  president  of  the
council;  1688, five commissioners appointed by  the  proprietor-
Thomas  Lloyd,  Robert Turner, Arthur Cook,  John  Symcock,  John
Eckley; 1688, John Blackwell, deputy; 1690, Thomas Lloyd,  presi-
dent  of  council;  1691, Thomas Lloyd,  deputy  governor;  1693,
Benjamin  Fletcher,  William Markham, liutenant  governor;  1695,
William Markham, deputy, 1699, William Penn; 1701, Andrew  Hamil-
ton,  deputy;  1703, Edward Shippen, president  of  the  council;
1704, John Evans, deputy; 1709, Charles Gookin, deputy; 1717, Sir
William Keith, deputy; 1726, Patrick Gordon, deputy; 1736,  James
Logan,  president  of the council; 1738, George  Thomas,  deputy;
1747,  Anthony  Palmer,  president of the  council;  1748,  James
Hamilton,  lieutenant governor; 1754, Robert H.  Morris,  deputy;
1756, William Denny, deputy; 1759, James Hamilton, deputy;  1763,
John Penn; 1771, James Hamilton, president of the council;  1771,
Richard Penn; 1773, John Penn.
    Under  the constitution of 1776  (presidents of  the  supreme
council): 1777, Thomas Wharton; 1778, Joseph Reed; 1781,  William
Moore;  1782,  John  Dickinson; 1785,  Benjamin  Franklin;  1788,
Thomas Mifflin.
    Under  subsequent constitutions: 1790, Thomas Mifflin;  1799,
Thomas  McKean; 1808, Simon Snyder; 1817; William Findlay;  1820,
Joseph  Heister; 1823, John Andrew Schultze; 1829,  George  Wolf;
1835,  Joseph  Ritner; 1839, David R. Porter;  1845,  Francis  R.
Shunk;  1848, William F. Johnston; 1852, William Bigler;  185(-),
James  Pollock; (note: (-) is transcribers for illegible.)  1858,
William  F. Packer; 1861, Andrew G. Curtin; 1867, John  W  Geary;
1873, John F. Hartranft; 1878, Henry M. Hoyt.

               ____________end page 25_____________

IMPORTANT  NOTE:  THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A PAGE 26  TO  THIS
BOOK.  TABLE OF CONTENTS SKIPS FROM PAGE 25 TO PAGE 27 AND  THERE
WAS NO PAGE 26.